Geological Controls on Variable Character of Arbuckle Reservoirs in Kansas: An Emerging Picture
Kansas Geological Survey
Open-file Report 2003-59

Geological Controls on Variable Character of Arbuckle Reservoirs in Kansas: An Emerging Picture

Evan K. Franseen, Alan P. Byrnes, Jason R. Cansler*, D. Mark Steinhauff**,
Timothy R. Carr, and Martin K. Dubois

Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas
(*Present Address: ChevronTexaco; **Present Address: ExxonMobil Exploration Company)

Introduction

Since the 1910’s, several billion barrels of oil have been produced from the Central Kansas Uplift (CKU), primarily from carbonate reservoirs within the Arbuckle and Lansing-Kansas City groups. The majority of Arbuckle reservoirs of central Kansas were drilled prior to 1955 and constitute a series of giant and near giant oil fields (Figure 1). The significance of the Arbuckle to Kansas production and reserves is highlighted by the estimate that Arbuckle reservoirs have produced about 2.19 billion barrels of oil (BBO) representing approximately 36% of the 6.1 BBO of total Kansas oil production to date (Figure 2). Arbuckle lease oil production is log-linearly distributed with nearly 50% of all production produced by 6% of all leases and approximately 80% produced from 20% of all leases (Figure 3). This lopsided distribution of Arbuckle lease productivity is typical of complex natural phenomena. Arbuckle reservoirs produce from 31 counties statewide with a significant portion of the total production coming from the 10 counties in the CKU region (Figure 4). Within the ten county area on the CKU, the Arbuckle has produced over 1,630 MBO, representing 69% of the production from the top four producing intervals in this region (Figure 5). Table 1 lists the 21 most productive Arbuckle fields and the cumulative oil production attributed to each. These fields represent approximately 56% of all Arbuckle production with nineteen of the fields lying on the CKU and the remaining two on the Nemaha Uplift in Butler and Cowley counties. Although the Arbuckle has been a prolific producing interval since 1917, annual production peaked in the early 1950’s at more than 68 million barrels and has declined to approximately 12 million barrels per year in 2002 (Figure 6). Today, stripper production dominates Arbuckle production with over 90% of wells producing less than 5 barrels of oil per day and is very sensitive to commodity prices.

The long production history and exploration/exploitation strategies have led to some commonly held perceptions about Arbuckle reservoir properties. These include:

  1. Arbuckle reservoirs are fracture-controlled karstic reservoirs with porosity and permeability influenced by basement structural patterns and subaerial exposure. The weathering and secondary solution of the upper Arbuckle beds, due to subaerial exposure, is thought to have significantly enhanced porosity and permeability and created petroleum reservoirs in these strata (Walters, 1958: Merriam, 1963; Adler, 1971).
  2. The Arbuckle is composed predominantly of shallow-shelf dolomites. The process of dolomitization enhanced porosity.
  3. Most of the oil and gas zones in the Arbuckle are contained in the top 25 ft, some are 25-50 ft within the Arbuckle (Adler, 1971) and Arbuckle wells are characterized by high initial potential, steep decline rates, and production of large quantities of oil at high water/oil ratios. Thus, Arbuckle reservoirs typically have been visualized as an oil column on top of a strong aquifer. This conceptual model of the Arbuckle reservoir resulted in drilling and completion practices in which wells were drilled into the top of the Arbuckle with relatively shallow penetration (under 10 ft. or 3 m) and completed open hole.

This paper illustrates some studies on various geologic aspects of the Arbuckle Group in Kansas that demonstrate that the commonly held perceptions are not true everywhere and that Arbuckle reservoir character can be complex. These studies also are providing a clearer picture of the different types of Arbuckle reservoirs, which is becoming increasingly important because the Arbuckle is currently undergoing improved oil recovery (IOR) efforts, and being considered for future CO2 floods, and carbon sequestration. Improved reservoir characterization and IOR efforts could potentially lead to recovery of hundreds of millions of barrels of oil from Arbuckle reservoirs in Kansas.

Field Name Cumulative Oil bbl) Active Wells Twn Rng County Depth
CHASE-SILICA 307,571,872 876 18S_10W BARTON, RICE, STAFFORD 3,328
TRAPP 300,087,115 726 15S_14W BARTON, RUSSELL 3,252
EL DORADO 299,365,153 618 25S-5E BUTLER 2,550
BEMIS-SHUTTS 248,694,147 2,150 10S-16W ELLIS/ROOKS 2,967
HALL-GURNEY 152,414,246 1,107 14S-13W BARTON, RUSSELL 3,192
KRAFT-PRUSA 130,826,618 700 15S-10W BARTON, ELLSWORTH, RUSSELL 2,885
GORHAM 94,783,868 369 14S-15W RUSSELL 3,289
GENESEO-EDWARDS 85,900,491 190 18S-8W ELLSWORTH/RICE 3,278
FAIRPORT 58,735,912 368 12S-15W ELLIS/RUSSELL 3,350
BLOOMER 55,787,569 244 17S-10W BARTON/ELLSWORTH/RICE 3,200
STOLTENBERG 52,996,954 470 15S-19W BARTON/ELLSWORTH 3,333
RAY 48,122,148 159 5S-20W GRAHAM, NORTON, PHILLIPS, ROOKS 3,540
AUGUSTA 47,773,725 111 28S-4E BUTLER 2,600
MOREL 46,765,270 444 9S-21W GRAHAM 3,718
MARCOTTE 41,659,245 221 9S-19W ROOKS 3,752
VOSHELL 36,066,429 22 20S-3W MCPHERSON 3,400
IUKA-CARMI 34,128,807 226 27S-13W PRATT 4,354
COOPER 25,486,646 112 9S-20W GRAHAM/ROOKS 3,216
RUSSELL 23,243,643 53 13S-14W RUSSELL 3,280
GATES 21,519,184 125 21S-12W STAFFORD 3,679
TRICO 20,959,428 144 10S-20W ELLIS/GRAHAM/ROOKS/TREGO 3,651
RICHARDSON 19,843,416 75 22S-11W STAFFORD 3,537
OXFORD 18,196,474 26 32S-2E SUMNER 2,890
BARRY 17,812,734 132 8S-19W ROOKS 3,430
MUELLER 15,950,997 105 21S-12W STAFFORD 3,594
OTIS-ALBERT 15,278,960 22 18S-16W BARTON 3,703
GALLAH 14,805,787 37 12S-21W TREGO 3,961
GREENWICH 14,165,749 20 26S-2E SEDGWICK 3,321
BOYD 14,055,036 54 17S-13W BARTON 3,438
MAX 13,344,772 63 21S-11W STAFFORD 3,570
LORRAINE 12,666,332 26 17S-9W ELLSWORTH 3,200
TOBIAS 12,521,480   20S-9W RICE 3,218
SOLOMON 12,083,711 86 11S-19W ELLIS 3,629
IRVIN 11,812,943 76 13S-19W ELLIS 3,860
NORTON 11,692,977 88 3S-23W NORTON 3,778
DOPITA 11,321,826 131 8S-17W ROOKS 3,409
HITTLE 10,542,917 240 31S-4E COWLEY 3,280
NORTHAMPTON 10,113,608 51 9S-20W ROOKS 3,803
DRACH 10,016,115 23 22S-13W STAFFORD 3,690
TOTAL 2,379,114,304 10,710   Note: Many fields produce from multiple horizons and not all production is Arbuckle

Table 1: Twenty-one major Arbuckle fields.

Click here to view the report in PDF format

top of report

e-mail : webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
Last updated April 2004

http://www.kgs.ku.edu/PRS/publication/2003/ofr2003-59/index.html