Skip Navigation

Eldorado Oil and Gas Field

Prev Page--Oil and Gas Sands || Next Page--Chelsea Dome


The Smock and Sluss Pools

Location and Extent

Located to the southeast and across the Walnut river from the main developed field lies a narrow strip of producing oil territory which constitutes the Smock and Sluss pools. This strip of developed territory extends from sec. 11, T. 27 S., R. 5 E., on the south, through sec. 2, T. 27 S., R. 5 E., secs. 35, 26, 25 and 24 of T. 26 S., R. 5 E., and into sec. 19, T. 26 S., R. 6 E. It is not only geographically but also structurally distinct from the main field, although probably genetically related. The development in this area started from two principal centers—one on the Smock farm, in sec. 2, T. 27 S., R. 5 E., where the discovery well was completed in March, 1917, with an initial daily production of about 500 barrels; and the other, one and three-fourths miles to the north, on the Sluss farm, in sec. 26, T. 26 S., R. 5 E., where the first well was brought in in August, 1917, with a production of 100 barrels daily.

Continued drilling in 1918 and 1919 has greatly diminished the distance separating these pools, until they have nearly coalesced. Since much of the drilling in the intervening area took place after the completion of the field work on which this report is based, accurate information concerning this development feature could not be obtained, and hence it is not shown on plates I and XIV. However, as the two pools are theoretically, if not practically, a unit, they will be treated together.

Stratigraphy

The general stratigraphy of the Smock-Sluss district is in practically every respect identical with that given in the main portion of this report, and hence there is no need for further general discussion.

Of interest, however, are the character and stratigraphic position of the single pay zone of this district. No drill cuttings of the pay rock were collected, and hence no information other than the drillers' interpretation, as given in well logs, can here be presented. Drillers report the pay rock as "sand," but so also is reported the Stapleton pay of the main field; hence it is possible, and to the writer it seems probable, that the Sluss and Smock "sands" may be similar in character to the Stapleton oil zone, which ranges from limestone to sandstone. And it seems further possible that the Sluss and Smock "sands" occupy the same stratigraphic position as the Stapleton; that is, the upper part of the eroded Mississippian rock series. While this cannot be readily demonstrated, the position of this pool to the east of the major anticline, together with the greater depth of the oil sand below the Fort Riley limestone, approximately 2,700 feet in comparison to the 2,460 feet of the Stapleton pay zone in Stapleton well No. 1, conforming closely to the thickness interpretation of the Cherokee and Marmaton formations in this locality as outlined on page 41, constitute evidence for such a correlation.

Structure

Surface Rocks

In mapping the surface rocks of the Smock-Sluss district more than usual care was exercised to find the presence of any flexing that might be present, but none could be detected. The pools lie on the regular westward dipping monocline characteristic of the region. It is possible, but not probable, that the dip here is slightly below normal, about twenty feet, to the mile, but inasmuch as the region to the cast has been mapped for only about a mile, the possibility cannot be well determined. The surface structure is not indicative of the presence of oil, and the discovery of this pool is due entirely to the efforts of the wildcat operator. In this respect these pools are quite different from the main Eldorado field. The smallness of these pools may be indicative of the size of pools which wildcat operations may be expected to discover in this general region.

Oil Pay

Sufficient evidence for the drawing of contours on the oil pay of the Sluss-Smock district was obtained only for the Smock end or southern part of this linear area. Here an underground anticline is well indicated, with its axis trending east of north and paralleling the trend of producing territory. (See plate XIV.) The distribution of the oil with respect to this arching shows it to be limited to the upper part of this underground anticline, and within the area where the sand is contoured it appears to be confined to an area which is within forty feet (vertically) of the crest of the fold. A similar structural situation appears to obtain in the Sluss neighborhood one and one-half miles to the north, and although the evidence at hand is insufficient for contouring, there seems reason for thinking that the probable fold is here simply the continuation of the Smock fold, and that this line of folding may extend both to the north and south; in other words, that this linear fold or zone of folding represents a tectonic line along which minor folding took place in pre-Permian time, and which has been concealed by the later-deposited Permian rocks now exposed at the surface. It probably is a fold initiated by a vertical movement along a fault plane, or shear zone, in the pre-Cambrian basement, as proposed on pages 155-164, and the outstanding difference between it and the larger Eldorado anticline is that no post-Permian deformation has taken place here to fold the rocks now exposed at the surface. This may indicate that the fold in the pay rock is of much smaller magnitude-a fact which is further evinced by the greater depth of the folded oil-bearing zone.

Logs of a Smock farm well and of a Sluss farm well are given below:

Log of J. S. Cosden's Smock Farm Well No. 1.
Location: Southeast corner NW, sec. 2, T. 27 S., R. 5 E. Drilled March 22 to June 13, 1917. Elevation of well mouth, 1,320 feet, which is about same elevation as top of Fort Riley limestone. Initial production, 232 barrels. Log furnished by Cosden Oil and Gas Company.
Drillers' record Thickness
in feet
Depth in
feet
Geological correlation
Hard, gray lime 90 90 Fort Riley limestone and Florence flint.
Soft, red rock 15 105  
Hard, white rock 5 110  
Soft, blue slate 15 125  
Soft, red rock 10 135  
White, hard lime 55 190  
Soft, blue slate 40 230  
Hard, black shale 10 240  
Soft, blue slate 15 255  
Hard, blue lime 10 265  
Soft, blue shale 50 315  
Soft, white sand 15 330  
Hard, white lime 30 360  
Soft, blue shale 10 370  
Hard, white lime 5 375  
Soft, blue slate 5 380  
Hard, white lime 10 390  
Soft, blue shale 5 395  
Hard, white lime 15 410  
Soft, blue shale 15 425  
Hard, white lime 15 440  
Soft, blue slate 30 470  
Hard, white lime 25 495  
Soft, blue slate 10 505  
Hard, white lime 5 510  
Hard, white slate 20 530  
Hard, brown shale 20 550  
Soft, brown slate 40 590  
Hard, blue lime 10 600  
Soft, red rock 10 610  
Hard, white lime 5 615  
Soft, blue shale 35 650  
Soft, white slate 50 700  
Hard, brown shale 25 725  
Soft, white sand; hole full of water 15 740  
Soft, white shale 60 800  
Soft, white slate 16 815  
Hard, white lime 35 850  
Soft, blue slate; water 10 860  
Hard, white lime 60 920  
Soft, white shale 90 1,010  
Hard, white sand 10 1,020  
Hard, white lime 55 1,075  
Soft, blue shale 35 1,110  
Hard, white lime 70 1,180  
Soft, blue shale 5 1,185  
Hard, white lime 75 1,260  
Soft, blue slate 10 1,270  
Hard, white lime 75 1,345  
Soft, blue slate 10 1,355  
Hard, white lime 20 1,375  
Soft, blue slate 3 1,378  
Hard, white lime 10 1,388  
Soft, blue slate 5 1,393  
Hard, white lime 42 1,435  
Soft, blue slate 35 1,470  
Hard, white lime 70 1,540  
Soft, blue slate 58 1,598  
Hard, blue lime 4 1,602  
Hard, white, sandy shale 40 1,642  
Hard, white lime 10 1,652  
Soft, blue slate 28 1,680  
Hard, white lime 25 1,705  
Soft, blue slate 90 1,795  
Hard, white lime 55 1,850 Lansing formation.
Hard, white sand 20 1,870
Hard, white lime 120 1,990
Soft, white slate 130 2,120
Hard, blue lime; water 15 2,135 Kansas City formation.
Soft, blue slate 5 2,140
Hard, blue lime 64 2,204
Soft, blue slate 20 2,224  
Hard, white lime 46 2,270  
Soft, blue slate 20 2,290  
Hard, blue lime 10 2,300  
Soft, blue slate 5 2,305  
Hard, white lime 15 2,320  
Hard, blue shale 40 2,360  
Soft, white sand 20 2,380  
Soft, white slate 70 2,450  
Hard, white lime 20 2,470  
Soft, dark shale 120 2,590  
Hard, white lime 20 2,610  
Soft, brown shale 47 2,657  
Oil "sand," hard, green 24 2,681  
Oil "sand," soft, brown 20 2,701  
Soft, brown slate 3 2,704 Total depth.

Log of Houston-Dingee-Davis, Sluss Farm Well No. 1.
Location, southwest corner of NW SW, sec. 25, T. 26 S., R. 5 E. Elevation of well mouth, 1,345 feet which is a few feet below top of Fort Riley limestone. Casing record: 12 1/2-inch, 892 feet; 10-inch, 1,045 feet; 8 1/4-inch, 1,091 feet; 6 5/8-inch, 2,432 feet. Log furnished by Cassaday Oil and Gas Company.
Drillers' record Thickness
in feet
Depth in
feet
Geological correlation
Clay 4 4  
Lime 91 95 Fort Riley limestone and Florence flint.
Slate 15 110  
Red rock 5 115  
Lime 20 135  
Red rock 10 145  
Lime 60 205  
Slate 45 250  
Lime 8 258  
Slate 77 335  
Water sand 7 342  
Lime 8 350  
Slate 40 390  
Red rock 6 396  
Lime 4 400  
Slate 40 440  
Lime 8 448  
Slate 78 526  
Lime 8 534  
Shale 18 552  
Slate 18 570  
Lime 4 574  
Slate 52 626  
Red rock 8 634  
Slate 44 678  
Light sand 14 692  
Slate 25 717  
Lime 10 727  
Slate 40 767  
Light sand 10 777  
Black slate 13 790  
Gray slate 40 830  
Hard lime 45 875  
Lime 35 910  
Hard lime 12 922  
Black slate 12 934  
Gray slate 26 960  
Water sand 10 970  
Lime 26 996  
Slate 14 1,010  
Water sand 20 1,030  
Slate 10 1,040  
Lime 5 1,045  
Lime 2 1,047  
Slate 5 1,052  
Lime 26 1,078  
Slate 8 1,086  
Lime 4 1,090  
Slate 65 1,155  
White lime 50 1,205  
Hard lime 25 1,230  
Gray, soft slate 30 1,260  
Lime 22 1,282  
Water sand 12 1,294  
Lime 10 1,304  
Slate 5 1,309  
Lime 51 1,360  
Light shale 6 1,366  
White lime 12 1,378  
Black slate 4 1,382  
White lime 20 1,402  
White lime 33 1,435  
Dark shale 10 1,445  
White lime 15 1,460  
Dark shale 15 1,475  
White lime 67 1,542  
Gray shale 18 1,560  
White lime 15 1,575  
Dark shale 15 1,590  
White lime 5 1,595  
Dark shale 35 1,630  
Gray shale 70 1,700  
Lime 66 1,766  
Slate 69 1,835  
Lime 66 1,901 Lansing formation.
Hard lime 17 1.918
Lime 82 2,000
Slate 97 2,097
Shale 44 2,141
Lime 159 2,300 Kansas City formation.
Slate 12 2,312  
Lime 9 2,321  
Slate 5 2,326  
Slate 74 2,400  
Water sand 16 2,416  
Sand 4 2,420  
Water sand 5 2,425  
Lime 7 2,432  
White, hard lime 3 2,435  
Soft shale 5 2,440  
Hard lime 10 2,450  
Lime 20 2,470  
Slate 24 2,494  
Lime 22 2,516  
Slate 6 2,522  
Lime 8 2,530  
Slate 10 2,540  
Lime 7 2,547  
Slate 45 2,592  
Lime 5 2,597  
Slate 18 2,615  
Unrecorded 5 2,620  
Oil "sand" 26 2,746 Total depth.

Prev Page--Oil and Gas Sands || Next Page--Chelsea Dome

Kansas Geological Survey, Geology
Placed on web July 28, 2017; originally published 1921.
Comments to webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
The URL for this page is http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Bulletins/7/08_sluss.html