KGS Home Geohydrology Home Reports

Kansas Geological Survey, Open-file Report 2004-12
Part of the Direct Push Methods for Hydrostratigraphic Characterization Project


Supplementary Color Figures for "Direct-push Hydrostratigraphic Profiling: Coupling Electrical Logging and Slug Tests," Ground Water, Volume 43, No. 1

by
Stephen M. Sellwood1,2, John M. Healey1, Steffen Birk1,3, and James J. Butler, Jr.1,4
1) Kansas Geological Survey, 1930 Constant Ave., Campus West, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66047
2) currently at BT2, Inc., 2830 Dairy Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53718
3) currently at Center for Applied Geoscience, University of Tübingen, Sigwartstr. 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
4) Corresponding author


KGS Open File Report 2004-12
March 2004

The figures are also available as an Adobe Acrobat PDF file.

ofr04_12.pdf (316k)

To read this file, you will need the Acrobat PDF Reader, available free from Adobe.

Web Versions

Figure 5a--A three-dimensional image of electrical conductivity at GEMS viewed from the southeast of the profiling grid (approximate surface locations of profiles are marked; origin of grid coordinate system at HP8; interpolation performed with inverse-distance weighting (exponent = -3.5) algorithm in Tecplot (Amtec Engineering 2001); shapes of many of the smaller-scale features are artifacts of the grid spacing and the interpolation algorithm).

generally higher values in top half of section; mostly below 20 in bottom half; near 170 at HP8 and HP5

Figure 5b--A three-dimensional image of electrical conductivity at GEMS viewed from the northwest of the profiling grid (approximate surface locations of profiles are marked; origin of grid coordinate system at HP8; interpolation performed with inverse-distance weighting (exponent = -3.5) algorithm in Tecplot (Amtec Engineering 2001); shapes of many of the smaller-scale features are artifacts of the grid spacing and the interpolation algorithm).

generally higher values in top half of section; mostly below 20 in bottom half; above 160 at HP9, HP8, and HP5

Figure 7a--A three-dimensional image of hydraulic conductivity within the sand and gravel interval at GEMS viewed from the southeast of the profiling grid (approximate surface locations of profiles are marked; origin of grid coordinate system at HP8; interpolation performed with inverse-distance weighting (exponent = -3.5) algorithm in Tecplot (Amtec Engineering 2001); shapes of many of the smaller-scale features are artifacts of the grid spacing and the interpolation algorithm).

conductivity increases from top to bottom; higher value at mid section, HP3

Figure 7b--A three-dimensional image of hydraulic conductivity within the sand and gravel interval at GEMS viewed from the northwest of the profiling grid (approximate surface locations of profiles are marked; origin of grid coordinate system at HP8; interpolation performed with inverse-distance weighting (exponent = -3.5) algorithm in Tecplot (Amtec Engineering 2001); shapes of many of the smaller-scale features are artifacts of the grid spacing and the interpolation algorithm). 35

conductivity increases from top to bottom; higher values at bottom of section, HP1 and HP8


Kansas Geological Survey, Geohydrology
Placed online Jan. 11, 2005
Comments to webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
The URL for this page is HTTP://www.kgs.ku.edu/Hydro/DirectPush/2004/OFR04_12/index.html