Kansas Geological Survey
Open-file Report 2003-32
Lithofacies and early diagenesis are major controls on permeability (k) and porosity () despite complex diagenetic overprinting by sub-Pennsylvanian subaerial exposure and burial processes.
The permeability-porosity trend for all lithofacies are approximately bounded within two orders of magnitude by trendlines defined by:
log kin situ = 0.25 in situ - 2.5
log kin situ = 0.25 in situ - 4.5
log kin situ (md) =0.24 in situ(%) - 3.78
Subtrends for clusters of facies or individual facies may also be defined and are significantly more accurate with standard error of prediction of permeability decreasing with increasing selectivity of lithofacies characteristics. Standard error for a specific lithofacies is generally less than a factor of 3. Linear regression trends for spicule- and echinoderm-rich facies are:
log kin situ (md) =0.19 in situ (%) - 2.88 [Spicule-rich]
log kin situ (md) =0.12 in situ (%) - 1.04 [Echinoderm-rich]
Other Mississippian fields’, including Bindley and Ness City field, permeability (k)-porosity () trends are similar to those of the Schaben for similar lithofacies. One significant difference is that calcite cementation of spicule-rich pack-wackestones significantly occludes porosity and reduces permeability. The bounding trends can be considered to define the range of porosity for a given lithofacies trend. The low k- slopes of individual lithofacies trends indicate that increasing porosity does not significantly increase permeability compared with the influence of grain size. This is consistent with porosity development through dissolution of pores surrounded by permeability-controlling matrix.
Trends for echinoderm-rich and spicule-rich facies are significantly different:
log kin situ (md) =0.157 in situ (%) - 1.87 [Echinoderm-Bindley Field]
log kin situ (md) =0.147 in situ (%) - 1.50 [Echinoderm-Ness City Field]
log kin situ (md) =0.230 in situ (%) - 4.04 [Spicule-Bindley Field]
log kin situ (md) =0.170 in situ (%) - 2.76 [Spicule-Ness City Field]
Standard error of prediction of k ranges from a factor of 2 to 4.8. For all fields the lowest k- slope and highest predictive accuracy is obtained for a single lithofacies. With successive addition of more lithofacies into a statistical analysis the resulting trend-line slope approaches that of the bounding trends. The intercept varies as a function of the nature of the population grain/mold size.
e-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org
Last updated May 2003