Dakota Home Report Archive FY89 Ann Rep

Kansas Geological Survey, Open-File Rept. 90-27
Annual Report, FY89--Appendix A
Use "Back" on your browser to return to the page you were viewing.


Appendix A

Development and Documentation of Data Bases Pertaining to the Dakota Aquifer

Introduction

One of the primary activities undertaken during the first year of the Dakota aquifer program was the development of data bases pertaining to the Dakota aquifer that would fulfill the needs of the program and at the same time be available to other users outside of the program. Many data sources were accessed to provide information for these data bases, including published and unpublished reports containing data compilations and untabulated data of the Kansas Geological Survey; the Kansas Department of Health and Environment; the Kansas Corporation Commission; the Division of Water Resources, Board of Agriculture; Groundwater Management Districts 3 and 5; and the U.S. Geological Survey Kansas District Office and CMRASA Program. Below is the documentation for these new Dakota aquifer-related geologic, hydrologic and hydrochemical data bases.

The Geologic and Geophysical Data Bases

In order to understand the flow of ground water within the Dakota aquifer it is first necessary to develop an understanding of the geologic framework. As a first step toward this, a regional-scale data base of 980 paper-copy gamma-ray logs (all in API calibrated units) was compiled, each log describing the interval from the land surface to the Permian Stone Corral Formation or other Permian horizon beneath the Dakota aquifer. The logs were selected from the KGS log library at a density of one per township (36 square miles) wherever possible, except along township lines 11 S and 16 S where four were selected per township (see Figure A.1 showing the database distribution). The 11S and 16S townships were chosen for further, more detailed work on the geologic framework. The availability of modern calibrated logs throughout much of this area is very good due to the large number of oil and gas exploration wells. However, there are gaps in the data base in regions of the state where oil and gas exploration has been minimal or where existing logs do not include strata below the top of the Dakota Formation. Many of the gamma-ray logs (which depict the natural gamma radiation of the rocks) are combined with spontaneous potential and resistivity or neutron logs.

Each gamma-ray log in the data base was digitized from the paper copy by RLB Consultants, Independence, Kansas. The data was stored on double-density floppy discs for PC use and were copied onto four 1600 BPI tapes for use on the KGS Data General MV20000 computer.

Using the paper copies of the gamma-ray logs, depths to the top of 10 selected geologic formations in the Cretaceous and Permian systems were determined for each log. Depths to formation tops were also added from 38 test-hole lithologic logs from north-central Kansas described in KGS Bulletins. Modern calibrated gamma-ray logs are not available for these test holes. Formation tops were tabulated in a data file called GAM.XYZDPTH (see Table A.1 for format and geologic formations selected). Using this data, two other files were created tabulating elevations above sea level of the 10 formations and thicknesses of six of the formations. These are called GAM.XYZZZ (see Table A.2) and GAM.XYTHCK (see Table A.3) respectively.

Figure A-1. Distribution of data in the geophysical-log data base.

The contouring system SurfaceIII (Sampson, 1988) was used with the files GAM.XYZZZ and GAM.XYTHCK to create contoured surface and isopach (thickness) maps for various formations listed in the respective files.

An additional file called KDEL.XYZ (see Table A.4) listing the elevation of the top of the Dakota Formation at over 5700 different locations, mostly in the outcrop/subcrop zone, was compiled from the data sources listed below:

  1. The gamma-ray logs described above.
  2. Lithologic logs from test hole data in KGS county bulletins.
  3. GMD3 and GMD5 bedrock surface data.
  4. KGS irrigation bulletins.
  5. A preliminary study of the bedrock hydrogeology in central Kansas (Macfarlane et al., 1988).
Surface III was used with this data to create a detailed, formation-configuration map of the Dakota Formation.

Table A.1. Description and Format of GAM.XYZDPTH (Depths to Top of 10 Geologic Formations)

Record PositionDescription
01-13Legal location (township, range, section, quarter)
14-36Gimmap x and y coordinates
37-41Elevation of datum above sea level
42-46Depth to top of Carlile Shale (Kc)
47-51Depth to top of Greenhorn Limestone (Kgh)
52-56Depth to top of Graneros Shale (Kgr)
57-61Depth to top of Dakota Formation (Kd)
62-66Depth to top of Kiowa Shale (Kk)
67-71Depth to top of Morrison Formation (Jm)
72-76Depth to top of Upper Permian (Pu)
77-81Depth to top of Cedar Hills (Pch)
82-86Depth to top of Salt Plains (Psp)
87-91Depth to top of Stone Corral (Psc)

Elevations and depths are in feet.
A record of 9999 indicates depth to top unknown or formation not present at this location.

Table A.2. Description and Format of GAM.XYZZZ (Elevations of Tops of 10 Geologic Formations)

Record PositionDescription
01-13Legal location (township, range, section, quarter)
14-36Gimmap x and y coordinates
37-41Elevation of datum above sea level
42-46Elevation of top of Carlile Shale (Kc)
47-51Elevation of top of Greenhorn Limestone (Kgh)
52-56Elevation of top of Graneros Shale (Kgr)
57-61Elevation of top of Dakota Formation (Kd)
62-66Elevation of top of Kiowa Shale (Kk)
67-71Elevation of top of Morrison Formation (Jm)
72-76Elevation of top of Upper Permian (Pu)
77-81Elevation of top of Cedar Hills (Pch)
82-86Elevation of top of Salt Plains (Psp)
87-91Elevation of top of Stone Corral (Psc)

Elevations are in feet.
A record of 9999 indicates elevation above sea level unknown or formation not present at this location.

Table A.3. Description and Format of GAM.XYTHCK (Thicknesses of 6 Geologic Formations)

Record PositionDescription
01-13Legal location (township, range, section, quarter)
14-36Gimmap x and y coordinates
37-41Thickness of Graneros Shale (Kgr)
42-46Thickness of Dakota Formation (Kd)
47-51Thickness of Kiowa and Cheyenne (Kk)
52-56Thickness of Morrison Formation (Jm)
57-61Thickness of Upper Permian (Pu)
62-66Thickness of Cedar Hills (Pch)

Table A.4. Description and Format of KDEL.XYZ (Elevation Above Sea-Level of the Top of the Dakota Formation)

Record PositionDescription
01-13Legal location (township, range, section, quarter)
14-36Gimmap x and y coordinates
37-41Elevation of top of Dakota Formation (in feet)

Thicknesses are in feet.
A record of 9999 indicates thickness unknown at this location.

Hydraulic Head and Water-Use Data Bases

Hydraulic-head and water-use data of Kansas were obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey CMRASA Program on magnetic tape to start development of these data bases. The hydraulic head data were plotted on 1:500,000 bases maps of Kansas and were compared with data tabulations in publications of the U.S. Geological Survey and Kansas Geological Survey to check for errors in the data provided on tape. Additional hydraulic head data were added from Macfarlane et al. (1988), from drill-stem tests completed as part of an effort by U.S. Geological Survey to obtain additional data on the Dakota aquifer in the deep subsurface of northwest Kansas, and from the literature. The data distribution used to prepare the potentiometric surface map of the Dakota aquifer (Plate 1) is shown in Figure A.2. The water-use data were transferred into the Kansas Geological Survey computer system and remain in the same format as they were obtained (see Spinazola et al. 1987). Additional water-use data for the 1980's will be added to this data base from paper copies of information on water appropriations supplied by the Division of Water Resources. Table A.5 shows the format used to store the hydraulic head data and associated water-level data.

Figure A-2.Distribution of water-level data used to produce the predevelopment potentiometric surface of the Dakota aquifer.

Table A.5. Description and Format of file WL.XYZ (Water Levels in the Lower Cretaceous Aquifer System)

Record PositionDescription
01USGS file membership:
blank = working file only;
2 = project file and working file;
3 = data base, project file, and working file.
02* = water level on same line was selected for USGS project mapping
03-12Legal location (township, range, section, quarter)
13-37Gimmap x and y coordinates
38-41County code (see U.S. Department of Commerce, 1979)
42-46Geohydrologic unit code name (see table 1, USGS Open-FileReport 87-396, 1987)
47-54USGS geologic unit code (see table 1, USGS Open-File Report 87-396, 1987)
55-56Importance of formation as a source of water to the well:
P = primary; S = secondary; N = noncontributing; U = unknown
57-64Depth to top of formation
65-72Altitude of land surface
73-80Depth to bottom of well
81-88Depth to top of screened interval
89-96Depth to bottom of screened interval
97-104Depth to bottom of casing
105-112Depth to water
113-120Altitude of water level
121-131Date of water-level measurement in order of month/day/year
132Source of data:
A = Static water level from aquifer test;
P = Static water level from production test;
G,L, or R = post-1929 measured water level;
O = pre-1930 measured water level (location
of well generally uncertain)

Depths and elevations are in feet.

Water-Quality Data Base

Properties of the Water-Quality Data Base

The ground-water-quality data base is the most complex of the data bases needed in the Dakota aquifer investigation. The reason is that while geophysical, geologic, water-use, and water-level files may each have tens of different types of data entries for each record, the water-quality file has thousands of different entries possible for each record. The main component of the many quality entries is the thousands of different types of chemical properties, inorganic constituents and species, and organic compounds that can be determined.

Adding to the complexity of the data base is the different way in which many constituents and chemical properties can be measured and reported. For example, different analytical techniques have been used at different times to determine constituents and may give different results because they combine or exclude different species of the same element. In other cases, the analyses either represent the dissolved concentration of a constituent or the total content in a water (both the dissolved amount of the substance and that in the particulate matter included with the sample). The latter analysis is required for drinking water purposes because it is representative of the actual water consumed by the public. A dissolved concentration is more appropriate for determining the geochemistry of the aquifer water.

Some measurements are made in the field for unstable properties and constituents such as pH. Determinations of some of these properties and constituents in the laboratory may or may not be as good as the field values depending on the time since collection and preservation method. In cases where laboratory values are still valuable estimates of somewhat unstable properties and substances, a laboratory designation is attached to the analysis while a field code is included with the field measurement. Some determinations for the same constituent may be reported in different ways, for example, concentration in mg/L or microg/L and nitrate content expressed either as nitrate or nitrate-nitrogen. Finally, there may be different types of qualifications on the determination, including estimated values, less or greater than a certain value, determined but not detected, and quality control/assurance indications.

The U.S. Geological Survey uses a variable-length record for water-quality data, whether surface or ground water. Each record includes a sequence of analysis information before the actual chemical data. Each chemical property and constituent, reporting units, analytical method of analysis, and field or laboratory determination where appropriate are designated by a 5 digit parameter code. The current code list ranges from 00001 to 99830. Optional remarks codes for qualifications on the measurement, quality assurance, method, and precision accompany the parameter code and the value for a property or constituent. The advantage of the variable-length record is that only the properties and constituents for which there are data are included in the record. A powerful relational data-base management system is needed for this purpose that operates on the mainframe computers at the national centers of the USGS and on super minicomputers at the district offices of the Water Resources Divisions.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment uses a water-quality data-base system with a fixed-length record for surface and ground waters. Each record containing values for water-quality properties and constituents is 3,040 characters long. The quality record is referenced through the data-base management system to a station master file that contains location and some other site information, as well as links to other files. The quality record begins with 80 characters of location, time, laboratory, and matrix information for sample collection and analysis. Specific positions containing 10 spaces each for measurement values of 296 different chemical properties and constituents follow the initial information.

The 296 properties and constituents are those that KDHE must measure for water-supply and waste-site purposes and are on the list of STORET parameter codes that are used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The STORET and USGS parameter codes are the same. The chemical substances in the KDHE file include both inorganic and organic constituents. The categories of inorganic substances are mainly common constituents and metals, including those designated as priority pollutants. The organic compounds primarily comprise pesticides and volatile, acid, and base-neutral priority pollutants. Not all of the 296 positions are currently assigned to a specific chemical property or substance; several are vacant for future use.

The KDHE system of fixed-length records results in much vacant space in the data file. The data base operates on the State main frame computer in Topeka. Minicomputers are used to process data that is put on and taken from the main computer.

Kansas Geological Survey Ground-Water-Chemistry Data-Base System (KWATCHEM)

A data-base system for ground-water chemistry was developed for the Kansas Geological Survey as a part of the Dakota Aquifer Program. The system operates in the INFO relational data-base management software on the Data General MV-20000 computer. The INFO system is part of the ARC/INFO package obtained during 1989 at the Survey. Unfortunately, the INFO system cannot handle variable-length records. The Survey had attempted to obtain a more powerful relational data-base management system that could handle variable-length records, but the cost was too high for the current budget. Thus, the data-base system for ground-water quality had to be formed with the limitation of fixed-length records.

The number of chemical properties and constituents that the KGS could potentially use in water investigations is estimated as over several hundred. A logic of efficiency and economy of computer space and processing as well as flexibility was used during the development. First of all, the data base was constructed to be for subsurface waters only, thereby decreasing the amount of information needed for describing surface-water sites and samples. The resultant data base was designed for subsurface water samples taken from both the vadose (unsaturated) and the saturated zone, including ground waters as well as formation waters that have been sampled during petroleum exploration or production (oil-field brines).

The structure of the data base involves two types of files, (1) a master file containing information on the site characteristics including type and use of sampling site, sample geographic location (x, y data), and sample depth location (z data), and (2) a series of analytical files containing site identification reference, sample collection information, and chemical measurements. A record in the master file (Table A.6) exists for each unique sampling location (record positions 2-17). A sample location in latitude-longitude coordinates (record positions 2-14 in Table A.6) may have the same geographic location as another sample location, but a different depth, as in the case of multiple wells within tens of feet of each other or within a single borehole, or an individual well with multiple sample intervals. The master file for an unique location is structured such that a well or borehole sequence number (record positions 15-16) is used to indicate different holes or wells if more than one well or hole has the same geographic location, and a depth sequence letter (record position 17 for multiple sample intervals in one borehole or well. Thus, the file can handle different wells close to each other and with the same depth, such as a replacement well.

Table A.6 Master File for Site Locations in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-20  County code - USGS number
21-34  Township Range Section ABCD (to 2.4 acre tract)
35-38  Feet west of southeast corner of section
39-42  Feet north of southeast corner of section
43-49  X dimension - ARC/INFO conversion from longitude
50-56  Y dimension - ARC/INFO conversion from latitude
57  Medium code (soil water, spring, ground water, oil brine)
58-65  Geologic unit code - USGS
66-67  State drainage basin number
68-75  Drainage basin code - USGS
76-8272000 Elevation of land surface, ft (F6.1)
83-9072001 Depth of hole, total, ft (F7.1)
91-9872008 Depth of well, total, ft (F7.1)
99-10600003 Sampling depth, middle of interval, ft (F7.1)
107-11472015 Depth of top of sample interval, ft (F7.1)
115-12272016 Depth to bottom of sample interval, ft (F7.1)
123-13072002 Depth to top of water bearing zone sampled, ft (F7.1)
131-13872003 Depth to bottom of water bearing zone sampled, ft (F7.1)
139  Well, borehole, or lysimeter use or type - USGS code
140  Water use - USGS code
141-212  Descriptive location name, other site information
213-216  Site file record number

The resolution of the geographic location is to the nearest second of latitude and longitude, giving an areal rectangle of about 80 by 100 feet in Kansas. The legal location can be recorded to the nearest 1/256 of a section (2.5 acre for square-mile sections) in the master file (record positions 21-34) which is less accurate (larger) than the latitude-longitude rectangle. The latitude-longitude was selected as the site identification for the geographic location for this reason and also because it is the same identification that the USGS uses in their data-base system. Space was also provided in the master file for the county code (USGS system) in record positions 18-20, and feet west and feet north of the southeast corner of a section in record positions 35-38 and 39-42, respectively.

If only the legal location accompanies a record, the KGS computer program LEO is used to generate the latitude-longitude values for the file. Thus, many records are not actually accurate to the nearest second of latitude and longitude. The LEO program takes into account the many odd-shaped sections in Kansas. The Survey has continued to improve this program to more accurately convert section locations to latitude-longitude values. A problem that remains in the conversion, however, is that several different ways of recording legal locations exist. For example, if an odd-shaped section has sides that are not close to being perpendicular to one another and are not parallel to north-south and east-west lines, the different procedures for determining quarter sections and feet west and north of the southeast corner of a section could result in different locations, and therefore different latitude-longitude site identifications for a well.

The medium code in the master file indicates the type of sample site. Codes can be entered for unsaturated zone waters such as sampled from soil-suction lysimeters, for ground waters, and for brines produced during oil and gas extraction. The geologic unit code system used is the same as that of the USGS. Spaces for the State drainage-basin number and USGS drainage-basin code are provided to aid in rapidly assembling data for selected drainage basins. Both the use or type of the sample location and the water can also be entered according the same codes as used by the USGS.

Different depth-related or z-dimension data can be entered in a series of fields from record positions 76-138. They range from elevation of the land surface to depths of the borehole, well, and sample interval to depths of the top and bottom of the aquifer. This information is also coded according to the USGS data-base system for easier transfer of data.

A record in the analytical files represents a water sample collected at a site at a particular time. There are currently 8 analytical files in KWATCHEM (Tables A.7-A.14). Many unique sampling sites have multiple records due to collection on different dates, thus, the number of sample records in the analytical files exceeds the number of sample sites in the master file. Each analytical record can be related to the master file through the site identification, i.e., the latitude-longitude, well sequence number, and depth sequence letter that appear in the same positions (2-17) at the beginning of each analytical file as in the master file. The sample collection date and time follows the site identification. The sequence year, month, day is used because that is the order of search for dates. The full year number is entered because in about 10 years the number will change to 2000; use of only the last two digits of the year would allow confusion of early date in the 20th century with those in the 21st century.

Information on the agencies collecting and analyzing the samples is entered according to USGS codes. Positions are also provided for the laboratory sample number and the analysis status, such as under review, use in ongoing project only, or completed and ready for public release.

The rest of the data in the analytical files, starting with record position 48, is for physical-chemical properties and chemical concentrations. The maximum length of each file was set at 255 positions, the maximum operable line length in many text processing programs. Each analytical file contains a logical grouping of different chemical information. The chemical data are identified according to USGS parameter codes used in their WATSTORE system and in the U.S. EPA STORET system for water-quality data.

The first analytical file is called the major properties file (Table A.7). Physical and chemical properties for which entries can be made include temperature, conductance, pH, Eh, and specific gravity. Fields for dissolved solids concentration and common calculated characteristics of waters such as hardness and sodium adsorption ratio are also in the file.

Table A.7 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Major Physical and Chemical Properties.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5700010 Temperature, deg C
58-6700095 Specific conductance, field, microS/cm at 25 deg C (F8.0)
68-7790095 Specific conductance, lab, microS/cm at 25 deg C (F8.0)
78-8700400 pH, field or on chilled sample <24 hours old in lab (F8.2)
88-9700403 pH, lab (F8.2)
98-10700515 Total-dissolved solids, residue at 105 deg C, mg/L (F8.1)
108-11770300 Total-dissolved solids, residue at 180 deg C, mg/L (F8.1)
118-12770301 Total-dissolved solids, sum of constituents, mg/L (F8.1)
128-13700931 Sodium adsorption ratio, SAR (F8.2)
138-14700932 Percent sodium (F8.2)
148-15700900 Hardness, total, mg/L as CaCO3 (F8.1)
158-16700901 Hardness, carbonate, mg/L as CaCO3 (F8.1)
168-17700902 Hardness, non-carbonate, mg/L as CaCO3 (95902) (F8.1)
178-18700090 Eh, oxidation potential, mV (F8.1)
188-19772013 Specific gravity (F8.4)

Table A.8 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Dissolved Concentrations of Major and Minor Inorganic Constituents Commonly Determined by the KGS and USGS.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5700915 Ca, dissolved, mg/L (F8.1)
58-6700925 Mg, dissolved, mg/L (F8.2)
68-7700930 Na, dissolved, mg/L (F8.1)
78-8700933 Na + K, dissolved, mg/L (old by difference calculation) (F8.1)
88-9700935 K, dissolved, mg/L (F8.2)
98-10739086 Alkalinity, dissolved, total, lab, mg/L (F8.1)
108-11700440 Bicarbonate, field or chilled sample 48 hours old, mg/L (99440) (F8.1)
118-12790440 Bicarbonate, lab (00453, 95440) (F8.1)
128-13700445 Carbonate, field or chilled sample <24 hours old, mg/L (99445) (F8.1)
138-14790445 Carbonate, lab, mg/L (95445) (F8.1)
148-15700940 Chloride, dissolved, mg/L (F8.1)
158-16700945 Sulfate, dissolved, mg/L (F8.1)
168-17700631 Nitrate plus nitrite, dissolved, mg/L as N (F8.3)
178-18771851 Nitrate, dissolved, mg/L as NO3 (F8.3)
188-19700950 Fluoride, mg/L (F8.2)
198-20700955 Silica, dissolved, mg/L as SiO2 (F8.2)
208-21700608 Ammonia, dissolved, mg/L as N (F8.3)
218-22771846 Ammonia, dissolved, mg/L as NH4 (F8.3)
228-23700671 Orthophosphate, dissolved, mg/L as P (F8.3)
238-24700660 Orthophosphate, dissolved, mg/L as PO4 (F8.3)

The second analytical file contains values for the dissolved concentrations of major and minor inorganic constituents commonly determined by the KGS and USGS (Table 5.9). The third file comprises the total concentrations of major and minor inorganic substances that the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) commonly determines in water samples (Table A.9). The KDHE measures total concentrations because its main concerns relate to health, i.e., a person drinking water consumes constituents present in both the dissolved and particulate form. The KGS and USGS are generally more interested in the dissolved forms of the constituents to allow determination of water-rock interactions. Samples are usually filtered through 0.45 um membrane filters to separate the particulates from the sample before analysis for dissolved substances.

Table A.9 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Total Concentrations of Major and Minor Inorganic Constituents Commonly Determined by the KDHE.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5700916 Ca, total, mg/L (F8.1)
58-6700927 Mg, total, mg/L (F8.1)
68-7700929 Na, total, mg/L (F8.1)
78-8700937 K, total, mg/L (F8.1)
88-9700410 Alkalinity, total, field or chilled sample, mg/L as CaCO3 (F8.1)
98-10790410 Alkalinity, total, lab, mg/L as CaCO3 (00417, 95410) (F8.1)
108-11700430 Alkalinity, carbonate, field, mg/L as CaCO3 (99430) (F8.1)
118-12700940 Chloride, dissolved, mg/L (F8.1)
128-13790945 Sulfate, dissolved, mg/L (F8.1)
138-14700630 Nitrate plus nitrite, total, mg/L as N (F8.3)
148-15700618 Nitrate, total, mg/L as N (F8.3)
158-16700951 Fluoride, total, mg/L (F8.2)
168-17700610 Ammonia, total, mg/L as N (F8.3)
178-18700665 Phosphorus, total, mg/L as P (F8.3)
188-19701022 Boron, total, microg/L as B (F8.0)
198-20701045 Iron, total, microg/L as Fe (F8.0)
208-21701055 Manganese, total, microg/L as Mn (F8.0)
218-22701105 Aluminum, total, microg/L as Al (F8.1)

The fourth analytical file consists of dissolved concentrations of additional minor and trace inorganic constituents that the KGS or USGS may occasionally measure (Table A.10). The constituents include the metals iron, manganese, and aluminum, certain alkali and alkaline earth elements, and non-metals. The next file contains the dissolved concentration of dissolved trace metals (Table A.11). The sixth file is nearly identical to the fifth, except that the data is for the total contents of the trace metals as needed by the KDHE for assessment of water potability (Table A.12).

Table A.10 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Dissolved Concentrations of Minor and Trace Inorganic Constituents. Includes iron, manganese, and aluminum, alkale and alkaline earth elements, and non-metals.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5701020 Boron, dissolved, microg/L as B (F8.1)
58-6801046 Iron, dissolved, microg/L as Fe (F9.1)
69-7901047 Iron, ferrous, dissolved, as Fe (F9.1)
80-8901056 Manganese, dissolved, microg/L as Mn (F8.1)
90-9901106 Aluminum, dissolved, microg/L as Al (F8.1)
100-10900613 Nitrite, dissolved, mg/L as N (F8.3)
110-11971856 Nitrite, dissolved, mg/L as NO2 (F8.3)
120-12900666 Phosphorus, dissolved, mg/L as P (F8.3)
130-13901130 Lithium, dissolved, microg/L as Li (F8.0)
140-14901135 Rubidium, dissolved, microg/L as Rb (F8.1)
150-15901115 Cesium, dissolved, microg/L as Cs (F8.1)
160-16901080 Strontium, dissolved, microg/L as Sr (F8.0)
170-17901005 Barium, dissolved, microg/L as Ba (F8.1)
180-19071870 Bromide, dissolved, microg/L as Br (F8.0)
191-20171867 Inorganic iodine, dissolved, microg/L as I (F9.1)
202-21271865 Iodide, dissolved, microg/L as I (F9.1)
213-22271868 Iodate, dissolved, microg/L as I (F8.1)

Table A.11 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Dissolved Concentrations of Trace Metals.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5701095 Antimony, dissolved, microg/L as Sb (F8.1)
58-6701000 Arsenic, dissolved, microg/L as As (F8.1)
68-7701010 Beryllium, dissolved, microg/L as Be (F8.2)
78-8701015 Bismuth, dissolved, microg/L as Bi (F8.1)
88-9701025 Cadmium, dissolved, microg/L as Cd (F8.2)
98-10701030 Chromium, dissolved, microg/L as Cr (F8.1)
108-11701032 Chromium, hexavalent, dissolved, microg/L as Cr (F8.1)
118-12701035 Cobalt, dissolved, microg/L as Co (F8.1)
128-13701040 Copper, dissolved, microg/L as Cu (F8.1)
138-14701049 Lead, dissolved, microg/L as Pb (F8.2)
148-15771890 Mercury, dissolved, microg/L as Hg (F8.2)
158-16701060 Molybdenum, dissolved, microg/L as Mo (F8.1)
168-17701065 Nickel, dissolved, microg/L as Ni (F8.1)
178-18701145 Selenium, dissolved, microg/L as Se (F8.1)
188-19701075 Silver, dissolved, microg/L as Ag (F8.2)
198-20701057 Thallium, dissolved, microg/L as Tl (F8.1)
208-21701100 Tin, dissolved, microg/L as Sn (F8.1)
218-22701150 Titanium, dissolved, microg/L as Ti (F8.1)
228-23701085 Vanadium, dissolved, microg/L as V (F8.1)
238-24701090 Zinc, dissolved, microg/L as Zn (F8.1)

Table A.12 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Total Concentrations of Trace Metals.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14   Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5701097 Antimony, total, microg/L as Sb (F8.1)
58-6701002 Arsenic, total, microg/L as As (F8.1)
68-7701007 Barium, total, microg/L as Ba (F8.1)
78-8701012 Beryllium, total, microg/L as Be (F8.2)
88-9701017 Bismuth, total, microg/L as Bi (F8.1)
98-10701027 Cadmium, total, microg/L as Cd (F8.2)
108-11701034 Chromium, total, microg/L as Cr (F8.1)
118-12701037 Cobalt, total, microg/L as Co (F8.1)
128-13701042 Copper, total, microg/L as Cu (F8.1)
138-14701051 Lead, total, microg/L as Pb (F8.2)
148-15771900 Mercury, total, microg/L as Hg (F8.2)
158-16701062 Molybdenum, total, microg/L as Mo (F8.1)
168-17701067 Nickel, total, microg/L as Ni (F8.1)
178-18701147 Selenium, total, microg/L as Se (F8.1)
188-19701077 Silver, total, microg/L as Ag (F8.2)
198-20701059 Thallium, total, microg/L as Tl (F8.1)
208-21701102 Tin, total, microg/L as Sn (F8.1)
218-22701152 Titanium, total, microg/L as Ti (F8.1)
228-23701087 Vanadium, total, microg/L as V (F8.1)
238-24701092 Zinc, total, microg/L as Zn (F8.1)

The seventh analytical file includes concentration data for dissolved gases and miscellaneous properties and constituents related to drinking waters such as in the KDHE computer data system for water quality (Table 5.14). The last file presently in KWATCHEM contains fields for radioactive constituent concentrations and properties (Table 5.15). Additional analytical files that will be constructed in the future will include groups of organic substances in water. However, the Dakota aquifer program concerns mainly natural sources of constituents. The main current effect of anthropogenic activities on Dakota water quality are related to salinity from oil-field brines and from past agricultural practices that could affect nitrate and dissolved inorganic substances. More recent agricultural activities involving organic pesticides may also begin to affect water quality as recharge waters reach shallow portions of the Dakota aquifer. Table A.13 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Dissolved Gases and Miscellaneous Drinking Related Properties and Constituents in KDHE Water-Quality Data System.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5700299 Oxygen, dissolved, polaragraphic probe, mg/L (F8.2)
58-6700300 Oxygen, dissolved, chemical analysis, mg/L (F8.2)
68-7700746 Sulfur, dissolved, mg/L as S (F8.2)
78-8771875 Hydrogen sulfide, dissolved, mg/L as H2S (F8.2)
88-9700310 BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand, 5-day at 20 deg C, mg/L (F8.2)
98-10700335 COD, Chemical oxygen demand, 0.025N dichromate, mg/L (F8.2)
108-11700681 Organic carbon, dissolved, mg/L as C (F8.2)
118-12700680 Organic carbon, total, mg/L as C (F8.2)
128-13700720 Cyanide, total, mg/L as CN (F8.2)
138-14781375 Organic halogen, total, microg/L (F8.2)
148-15732730 Phenols, total, microg/L (F8.2)
158-16738260 Methylene blue active substance, mg/L (F8.2)
168-17700076 Turbidity, NTU (F8.2)
178-18700530 Suspended solids, residue at 105 deg C, mg/L (F8.1)
188-19774021 Sodium bicarbonate alkalinity (F8.1)
198-20731501 Coliform, membrane filter, immed. M-endo medium (col/100 mL) (F8.1)
208-21731616 Fecal coliform, mem. filter, M-FC med. 44.5 deg (col/100 mL) (F8.1)
218-22731673 Fecal streptococci, membrane filter, KF agar (col/100 mL) (F8.1)

Table A.14 Analytical File in the KWATCHEM Water-Quality Data-Base System for Radioactive Constituents and Properties.

Record position USGS code Description
1  File number
2-14  Site ID - Lat, Long (deg, min, sec), same as USGS
15-16  Site ID - well or borehole sequence number, same as USGS
17  Site ID - sample depth sequence letter
18-25  Collection date - Year (1989) Mon (05) Day (05)
26-29  Time - 24 hour clock
30-3400027 Agency collecting sample, USGS code
35-3900028 Agency analyzing sample, USGS code
40-46  Lab number
47  Analysis status
48-5701515 Gross alpha radioactivity, dissolved, pc/L as U natural (F8.2)
58-6701516 Gross alpha radioactivity, suspended total, pc/L as U natural (F8.2)
68-7703515 Gross beta radioactivity, dissolved, pc/L as Cs-137 (F8.2)
78-8703516 Gross beta radioactivity, suspended total, pc/L as Cs-137 (F8.2)
88-9780050 Gross beta radioactivity, dissolved, pc/L as Sr/Yt-90 (F8.2)
98-10703517 Gross beta radioactivity, suspended total, pc/L as Sr/Yt-90 (80060) (F8.2)
108-11722703 Uranium, natural, dissolved, microg/L as U (F8.2)
118-12722705 Uranium, natural, suspended total, microg/L as U (F8.2)
128-13780020 Uranium, dissolved, extraction fluorometric, microg/L as U (F8.2)
138-14709511 Radium, dissolved, radon method, pc/L (F8.3)
148-15709505 Radium, suspended total, pc/L (F8.3)
158-16782305 Radon 222, dissolved, pc/L (F8.2)
168-17782362 Radon 222, dissolved gas, pc/L (F8.2)
178-18782303 Radon 222, total, pc/L (F8.2)
188-19707005 Tritium, dissolved, pc/L (F8.2)
198-20707018 Tritium, dissolved, tritium units (F8.2)

Ground-Water Quality Data Sources for the Dakota Aquifer Program

There are several sources of water-quality data obtained, examined, and, in some cases revised, that were used for the Dakota aquifer study: publications of the Kansas Geological Survey (KGS), data recently obtained from water analyses at the Kansas Geological Survey and Kansas State University conducted as part of the Dakota study, computer data files from the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), computer data files of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) available through the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), and paper files of the KDHE.

The data from KGS publications are mainly in the Bulletins, Chemical Series, and Irrigation Series, as well as from some recent publications. The Bulletins include data collected from the late 1930's to the early 1960's. The data collected during the 1970's are listed in the Chemical and Irrigation series. Table 5.16 lists KGS publications containing water-quality data that were examined for Dakota water analyses. Chemical analyses from recent KGS reports and generated during this study on the Dakota aquifer, including water samples collected and analyzed by Kansas State University during the irrigation efficiency study, were entered into the KWATCHEM data base.

Table A.15. Kansas Geological Survey publications for counties in Kansas where strata of the Dakota aquifer crop out or are present in the subsurface. The table shows the possible sources of water-quality data published by the Survey. Not all publications may actually include chemical data for the Dakota aquifer. The column for DB sites includes the number of sites containing water-quality data in the KWATCHEM data-base system.

CountyDB SitesKGS Publications
Barton47 Bull. no. 88, p. 118-121; OFR 88-39
Cheyenne0CS no. 7
Clark0 

Several different formatted computer data files were obtained from the USGS office. The working file and the subset of the working file called the QW file for the Dakota aquifer (Great Plains aquifer) portion of the Regional Aquifer System Analysis (RASA) program were obtained in an HN2 card-formatted format. A WATSTORE file for the Dakota was also obtained and was in a spreadsheet-formated file. A card-formatted file was also obtained in the 1-star version. A majority of the data currently in the KWATCHEM system for the Dakota study came from the USGS files. The files overlap one another. The time period of the data in each file is dependent upon the publishing date; the newer the version, the more data present.

Data from the EPA/KDHE in the STORET format were largely included in the USGS files, except for more recent data collected in 1985 - 1987.

Examination, Correction, and Entering of Source Data

Early in the process of using the USGS data sets from the RASA study, many problems were found in the data. There were many duplicate records that had essentially the same data, multiple records that existed for the same location and sampling date, and records that contained errors. The duplicate records were largely caused by slight differences in the data such as chemical concentrations rounded to different numbers of significant digits. In some cases, the chemical concentrations were the same, but a couple constituents were entered under a different code, such as a dissolved form in one record and a total form in the other record. Multiple records contained much of the same data, but had different additional site and chemical information. Errors found in the records ranged from incorrect entries from the original data to incorrect coding of the chemical data.

A series of interactive FORTRAN programs were written to retrieve the data in different formats. The programs searched for chemical parameters codes and their associates values. The output format was modified to the form needed for data examination. Other programs were written to manipulate the data to keep remarks codes in a consistent form to allow comparison of data from different sources. Each data file was checked for duplication of records within itself by a computer program. The duplicate records were eliminated, and new unique-record files were created. These files were then compared for duplicate records among the different sources, and the duplicates were deleted.

The data also were checked by several approaches to make sure the data are reliable. The methods included calculations of cation-anion charge balance, comparison of measured and calculated total-dissolved solids concentrations and specific conductances (using the approximate fraction of 2/3 of the specific conductance in micromho/cm or microS equals the TDS in mg/L), comparison of the hardness content listed with that computed from the calcium and magnesium listed, comparison of the alkalinity reported with the bicarbonate concentration listed converted to alkalinity, comparison of the non-carbonate hardness with the alkalinity, and other comparisons. When a value was found that was inconsistent with the rest of the record, an attempt was made to find the probable original source of the data in a publication. Most of those found were in KGS bulletins and series. Any discrepancy in the computer file relative to a published record was then corrected. Most of the errors were found in the USGS working file used in the RASA study. However, a few errors were also found in the USGS WATSTORE data that the district and national offices of the USGS use. The following are specifics of most of the types of errors found in the data:

  1. Mistyped numbers.
  2. Incorrect well depth and/or sampling depth entered, for example, in many cases, one of the sampling depths of an observation well with multiple sampling intervals treated as the total well depth.
  3. Incorrect geological unit code, either not matching that listed in the publication, or the sampling depth not agreeing the geologic unit for that interval.
  4. Over-rounded values, such as 760 rounded to 1000.
  5. Misplaced decimal point.
  6. Values placed under a wrong code, such as the total hardness (00900) values placed under non-carbonate hardness (95902) in a WATSTORE file.
  7. Miscalculation of computed values such as hardness or TDS.
  8. Incorrect location, such as data in the computer file matching that for a sample collected from another well location for which an analysis is listed in the source publication, but not the analysis for the listed location.
In several cases, the source of an inconsistency in a computer file could not be determined. For a few records for which the source publication was located, the origin of the inconsistency could not be conclusively identified because there was a possibility that the publication may have contained a typographical error or misprinted information. Source publications could not be located for a few records with inconsistencies such as larger charge-balance errors and no constituent with an obviously large or small concentration. A few records also contained values of constituents that appeared unreasonable in comparison with other constituent concentrations or for data for nearby wells, although the data might actually be real. These data were left in the data base because most of the values in the records appear correct and provide useful information for the Dakota study.

During the course of the data inspection and correction, additional data were found in previous publications that are not in the USGS or EPA computer files. These, and data recently generated as part of the KGS Dakota Program, were entered into the KWATCHEM files.

Location information for the corrected, unique records are stored in both latitude-longitude and township-range-section formats in KWATCHEM. possible problem encountered during the data-base development was the procedure for entering new records. The problem is the inconsistency of using a location-convert program. For example, the original well location is often expressed as a legal location. This location has to be converted to the global location system for projection to x and y coordinated for use in computer graphics programs. In other cases, digitized data may contain the latitude and longitude values. Location data in these records may have been generated by a different system than the KGS LEO conversion program or by an earlier version of this program, and therefore may not have exactly the same location numbers as the ones obtained from the current KGS LEO program. In order to make sure that a truly unique site is being entered, both longitude-latitude and by township-range-section information must be checked.


Use "Back" on your browser to return to the page you were viewing.
Start of this report || Table of Contents
Kansas Geological Survey, Dakota Project
Original report available from the Kansas Geological Survey.
Electronic version placed online Nov. 1998
Scientific comments to P. Allen Macfarlane
Web comments to webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
URL=http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Dakota/vol3/fy89/app_a.htm