Skip Navigation

Glacial Deposits, Northeastern Kansas

Prev Page--Aquifer Parameters || Next Page--Chemical Quality


Water Use

The Division of Water Resources (DWR) in Kansas has kept records of water use and water appropriations since 1944 and has maintained a computerized data base of water-use information since 1981. Appropriated water volumes are generally 2.5 times larger than the actual reported use, with only 50-75% of the permit holders reporting (Kenny, 1986). Because of the relatively large and increasing population in northeastern Kansas, appropriations of water for public use and industrial use have been steadily increasing since 1944. In 1984, 28.4% [267 Mgpd (million gallons per day) (1.01 x 106 m3/d)] of the water appropriated in eastern Kansas was from a ground-water source. Public supplies made up 11.6%, industrial supplies 11.5%, and irrigation 5.3%. The total volume of water appropriated for 1984 was 942 Mgpd (3.57 x 106 m3/d).

The DWR reported a total water right volume of 147,920 acre-ft [132 Mgpd (5.00 x 105 m3/d)] in 1981 for the 12-county region of northeastern Kansas (table 6). From the given well locations we interpreted aquifer types from available well logs and hydrogeologic maps. Ninety-four percent of the water allocated came from alluvial aquifers; only 4% of the water was from glacial aquifers and less than 2% was from rock aquifers (tables 7 and 8). Most of the water rights were found in counties bordering the Kansas and Missouri River valleys, where 98% of the appropriations from alluvial aquifers are located. The number of wells and water volumes are calculated for use and aquifer categories by county and for the total 12-county area (tables 7 and 8).

Table 6--1981-1982 Volume of ground-water pumpage by type in northeastern Kansas. a

County Municipal useb Irrigation useb Industrial useb
1981 1982 1981 1982 1981 1982
Atchison 1,107,893
(3)
71,048,552
(218)
49,529,352
(152)
0 0 0
Brown 263,668,853
(809)
230,243,058
(707)
0 0 0 0
Doniphan 156,411,738
(480)
215,446,164
(661)
20,307,034
(62)
8,100,655
(25)
0 0
Douglas 464,562,512
(1,426)
457,061,422
(1,403)
152,615,574
(468)
82,104,676
(252)
3,967,418,401
(12,176)
1,258,306,221
(3,862)
Jackson 5,637,222
(17)
108,632,206
(333)
0 0 0 0
Jefferson 270,544,309
(830)
238,011,345
(730)
48,167,294
(148)
83,942,476
(258)
8,732,806
(27)
9,606,087
(29)
Johnson 1,310,898,573
(4,023)
1,285,156,344
(3,944)
1,381,608
(4)
377,987
(1)
498,623,717
(1,530)
355,008,147
(1,090)
Leavenworth 1,087,615,692
(3,338)
1,350,971,728
(4,146)
2,219,045
(7)
34,422,899
(106)
0 0
Nemaha 226,388,240
(695)
363,239,143
(1,115)
0 0 55,189,383
(169)
60,481,204
(186)
Shawnee 164,118,114
(504)
176,601,466
(542)
552,728,017
(1,696)
1,013,507,399
(3,110)
2,228,276,668
(6,839)
2,202,837,481
(6,761)
Wabaunsee 120,708,244
(370)
36,009,794
(111)
28,632,527
(88)
462,910,447
(1,421)
36,935,210
(113)
32,128,908
(99)
Wyandotte 2,016,284,525
(6,188)
3,975,043,314
(12,200)
141,885,300
(435)
94,998,600
(292)
3,910,915,838
(12,003)
3,102,955,249
(9,523)
Total 6,087,945,915
(18,684)
8,507,464,536
(26,110)
997,465,751
(3,061)
1,780,365,139
(5,464)
10,706,092,020
(32,858)
7,021,323,297
(21,549)
a. As reported to the Division of Water Resources by February 16, 1984.
b. Reported to the Division of Water Resources in gallons. Acre-feet given in parentheses.
Conversion: acre-feet = gallons (1 ft317.48 gal) (1 acre-ft/43,560 ft3).
c. Pending rights (in acre-feet) as of May 1983 given in parentheses.

(Table 6, continued)

County Domestic useb Total useb Ground-water
rights allocated
as of May 1983
(acre-ft)c
Percentage
of rights
reportedly
pumped for use
1981 1982 1981 1982 1981 1982
Atchison 0 0 50,637,245
(155)
71,048,552
(218)
1,302 12 17
Brown 0 0 263,668,853
(809)
230,243,058
(707)
1,266 62 55
Doniphan 0 0 176,718,772
(542)
223,546,819
(686)
1,313 41 52
Douglas 0 0 4,584,596,487
(14,071)
1,797,472,319
(5,517)
16,559 85 33
Jackson 0 0 5,637,222
(17)
108,632,206
(333)
922 2 36
Jefferson 0 0 327,444,409
(1,005)
331,559,908
(1,018)
6,298
(37)
16 16
Johnson 0 0 1,810,903,898
(5,558)
1,640,542,478
(5,035)
21,285
(5)
26 24
Leavenworth 0 0 1,089,834,737
(3,345)
1,385,394,627
(4,252)
4,619
(4)
72 92
Nemaha 0 0 281,577,623
(864)
423,720,347
(1,300)
1,687
(270)
51 77
Shawnee 5,998,916
(18)
58,653
(0)
2,951,121,715
(9,057)
3,393,004,999
(10,413)
33,283
(380)
27 31
Wabaunsee 0 0 186,275,981
(572)
531,049,149
(1,630)
4,967
(132)
12 33
Wyandotte 0 0 6,069,085,663
(18,627)
7,172,997,163
(22,015)
54,419 34 40
Total 5,998,916
(18)
58,653
(0)
17,797,502,610
(54,622)
17,309,211,630
(53,124)
147,920
(828)
37 36
a. As reported to the Division of Water Resources by February 16, 1984.
b. Reported to the Division of Water Resources in gallons. Acre-feet given in parentheses.
Conversion: acre-feet = gallons (1 ft317.48 gal) (1 acre-ft/43,560 ft3).
c. Pending rights (in acre-feet) as of May 1983 given in parentheses.

Table 7--1983 Ground-water rights by use and aquifer for northeastern Kansas counties.

Water use and
aquifer typea
Number
of wells
Percentage
of volume
(acre-ft)
Total
volume
for
county
Atchison County (eight water rights)
Irrigation      
Alluvial 4 976 75
Municipal      
Alluvial 1 34 3
Glacial 10 292 22
Total 15 1,302 100
Brown County (11 water rights)
Municipal      
Alluvial 4 24 2
Glacial 15 1,017 78
Rock 8 225 20
Total 27 1296 100
Doniphan County (11 water rights)
Irrigation      
Alluvial 3 505 38
Municipal      
Alluvial 7 614 47
Glacial 6 194 15
Total 16 1,313 100
Douglas County (65 water rights)
Industrial      
Alluvial 21 9,947 60
Rock 3 82 0
Irrigation      
Alluvial 27 2,096 13
Rock 1 2 0
Municipal      
Alluvial 19 3,451 21
Glacial 1 0 0
Rock 36 981 6
Total 108 16,559 100
Jackson County (six water rights)
Municipal      
Alluvial 1 7 1
Glacial 5 890 96
Rock 2 25 3
Total 8 922 100
Jefferson County (70 water rights)
Industrial      
Alluvial 3 373 6
Irrigation      
Alluvial 36 3,223 51
Municipal      
Alluvial 20 1,779 28
Glacial 23 923 15
Total 82 6,298 100
Johnson County (14 water rights)
Industrial      
Alluvial 13 11,233 53
Rock 2 5 0
Irrigation      
Alluvial 5 357 2
Municipal      
Alluvial 22 9,690 45
Total 42 21,285 100
Leavenworth County (20 water rights)
Irrigation      
Alluvial 10 833 18
Municipal      
Alluvial 20 3,131 68
Glacial 1 62 1
Rock 14 593 13
Total 45 4,619 100
Nemaha County (23 water rights)
Industrial      
Rock 3 138 8
Irrigation      
Glaciala 1 70 4
Municipal      
Glaciala 30 1,479 88
Total 34 1,687 100
Shawnee County (217 water rights)
Domestic      
Alluvial 1 6 0
Industry    
Alluvial 26 14,820 45
Glacial 1 129 0
Irrigation      
Alluvial 187 16,242 49
Municipal      
Alluvial 17 2,086 6
Rock 1 3 0
Total 233 33,283 100
Wabaunsee County (54 water rights)
Industrial      
Alluvial 7 534 11
Irrigation      
Alluvial 41 4,107 83
Glacial (?) 1 65 I
Municipal      
Alluvial 11 169 3
Rock 7 92 2
Total 67 4,967 100
Wyandotte County (35 water rights)
Industry      
Alluvial 63 39,078 72
Irrigation      
Alluvial 3 1,356 2
Municipal      
Alluvial 28 13,816 25
Glacial 2 169 1
Total 96 54,419 100
a. Glacial and alluvial aquifers are included where
wells penetrate both aquifers.

Table 8--Summary of water rights by use and source for the 12-county study area (totals): 1983.

Water use
and aquifer
Number
of wells
Volume
(acre-ft)
Percentage
of total
volume
Domestic
Alluvial 1 3 0
Total 1 3 0
Industry
Alluvial 133 75,985 51
Rock 8 225 0
Glacial 1 129 0
Total 142 76,342 52
Irrigation
Alluvial 316 29,695 20
Rock 1 2 0
Glacial 2 135 0
Total 319 29,832 20
Municipal
Alluvial 150 34,801 24
Rock 68 1,919 1
Glacial 93 5,026 3
Total 311 41,746 28
Total 773 147,920 100

Fifty-two percent of the total rights were allocated for industrial use, and Wyandotte County had 51% of the total allocated volume for industrial use [39,078 acre-ft or 35 Mgpd (1.3x 105 m3/d)] in the 12-county area. Shawnee, Johnson, and Douglas counties were allocated 19%, 15%, and 13%, respectively, of the industrial volume. There were 142 industrial wells reported.

A volume of 41,746 acre-ft [37 Mgpd (1.4 x 105 m3/d)], or 28% of the total volume for the study region, was allocated for municipal use. Although the number of municipal wells is almost twice that of industrial wells, the municipal use category was allocated about half the volume of water allocated for industrial use. Municipaluse allocations for the counties were generally related to population density, with Wyandotte County allocated 13,985 acre-ft [12.5 Mgpd (4.73 x 104 m3/d)), or 33.5% of the total municipal volume, and Johnson and Douglas counties allocated 23% and 10.6%, respectively, of the municipal total. In Brown and Jackson counties, all the wells reported were for municipal use.

Irrigation ground waters make up 20% of the total allocated volume. Shawnee County was allocated 55% of the total volume for irrigation use, distributed among 187 wells. Wabaunsee and Jefferson counties also had substantial water volumes allocated for irrigation.

Less than 0.1% of the total water allocated was attributed to the domestic, stock, and recreation categories. However, domestic wells generally do not need a water right, and domestic well owners do not report water use to the DWR.

Alluvial aquifers (600 wells) supplied most of the water allocated for industrial, irrigation, and municipal uses. Thirty-six wells tapping rock aquifers were allocated water for municipal use in Douglas County (table 7).

Ground water allocated from glacial aquifers was predominantly for municipal use and included 93 wells. One well in a glacial aquifer located in Shawnee County had an industrial use, and two glacial aquifer wells located in Wabaunsee and Nemaha counties were used for irrigation.

Table 6 shows ground-water use in 1981 and 1982, as reported to the DWR by February 16, 1984, for northeastern Kansas. Thirty-four percent was reportedly pumped for municipal supplies, 6% for irrigation, and 60% for industrial use in 1981. This amounted to 37% of the appropriated ground-water rights. In 1982, 49% was reportedly pumped for municipal supplies, 10% for irrigation, and only 41% for industrial use. Reported actual pumpage for 1982 was close to 36% of the allocated ground-water rights.

Wyandotte County reported the largest pumpage for municipal supplies, with 33% and 47% in 1981 and 1982, respectively; Shawnee County reported the largest pumpage of ground water for irrigation, averaging 56% of the total reported irrigation supplies for 1981 and 1982. Douglas and Wyandotte counties reported the largest pumpage for industrial purposes in 1981, with 26% and 34%, respectively. In 1982 Wyandotte County dominated the industrial-use category, reportedly pumping 41 % of the allocated water rights.

The fluctuation of use reported to the DWR may not reflect actual changes in use; rather, the fluctuations may reflect inconsistencies in the reports sent to the DWR. These inconsistencies make reliable comparisons from year to year difficult and of doubtful accuracy.

According to DWR records, no county in the 12-county region surpassed allocated ground-water rights; in several cases counties reported use of less than 20% of the allocated volume (see table 6). Leavenworth County reported the greatest percentage of use: 72% and 92% for 1981 and 1982, respectively. Atchison County reported the lowest percentage of use compared to allocated volume, with 12% and 17% for 1981 and 1982, respectively.

Allocations for wells associated with the main buried channel amount to 1,466 acre-ft of ground water from Atchison, Jackson, and Nemaha counties (table 9). Tributaries associated with the main buried channel contribute an additional 837 acre-ft of ground water, and these sources together account for 43% of the ground water used in 1981 for public supplies [750 Mgal (2.8 million m3)]. An additional 214 acre-ft from the three counties were derived from wells tapping a combination of glacial and alluvial deposits.

Table 9--Allocated ground water from wells associated with the main buried channel across northeastern Kansas.

Well location Reported
volume
(acre-ft)
Atchison County
NE SW NW sec. 22, T. 6 S., R. 18 E. 58.3
NE SW NW sec. 22, T. 6 S., R. 18 E. 43.0
Subtotal 101.3
Jackson County
NE SW NW sec. 7, T. 6 S., R. 16 E. 293.5
NE SW NW sec. 7, T. 6 S., R. 16 E. 293.5
Subtotal 587.0
Nemaha County
NW SE NW sec. 2, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 260.8
NW SW NW sec. 2, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 107.0
NW SW NW sec. 2, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 135.0
NW SE NE sec. 10, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 101.5
SW SW NW sec. 10, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 135.0
SE SW NE NE sec. 10, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 13.8
NW SE NE sec. to, T. 5 S., R. 11 E. 24.6
Subtotal 777.7
Totala 1,466
As of May 1983.
All wells are public supply wells.
Volume of ground water from tributaries to the main buried channel = 837 acre-ft (273 Mgpd). Volume of ground water from tributaries to the main buried channel tapping both glacial and alluvial sources = 214.4 acre-ft (70 Mgal or 0.2 Mgpd).
a. 1,466 acre-ft = 477 Mgal = 1.3 Mgpd.

We also collected public water-use information for northeastern Kansas from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) files (table 10). We gathered as much information as possible for 1981, but for many supplies we had to use data from other years or part of a year in place of the unavailable 1981 data. The water volumes were usually reported from cities and rural water districts and used meter readings as a reference, although in some cases volumes were estimated. It was not clear for some supplies how much water was sold to or acquired from other districts.

Table 10--Water-use data: volume reported for public use (1981).

County KDHE data DWR data
(acre-ft)
Absolute
difference
(acre-ft)
% Difference
(larger volume)
Mgal Acre-ft
Atchison 82.16 267.8 3 264.8 99
Brown 202.65 660.4 809 148.6 18.4
Doniphan 123.89 403.8 480 76.2 15.9
Douglas 315.08 1,026.8 1,426 399.2 28
Jackson 341.8 1,113.9 17 1,096.9 98.5
Jefferson 157.13 512.1 830 317.9 38.3
Johnson 5,272.17 17,182.0 4,023 13,159 76.6
Leavenworth 733.38 2,390.1 3,338 948 28.4
Nemaha 303.93 990.5 695 295.5 29.8
Shawnee 301.433 982.4 504 478.4 48.7
Wabaunsee 55.79 181.8 370 188.2 50.9
Wyandotte 59.81 194.9 6,188 5,993.1 96.8
Total 7,949.22 25,906.5 18,684 7,222.5 27.9

The largest percentage differences (>96%) in DWR and KDHE reported public ground-water use were from Atchison, Jackson, and Wyandotte counties. Use reported to the DWR for Atchison and Jackson counties was low, and volumes reported to the KDHE for Wyandotte County were also low. Large percentage differences were also apparent in Johnson, Shawnee, and Wabaunsee counties. Overall, volumes reported to the KDHE were 27.9% greater than those reported to the DWR.

According to water-well records, which have been required by the state since 1975, the greatest number of wells drilled were for domestic use (59.5%). Ten counties in the 12-county area of northeastern Kansas (excluding Wyandotte and Johnson counties) had the highest percentage of wells in the domestic category (table 11). Johnson and Wyandotte counties are affected by the great amount of industrial development in the Kansas City area. Johnson County had 116 observation wells drilled, and Wyandotte County had 282 wells in the observation-well category and other categories (e.g., dewatering, relief, and monitoring). There were records for 123 observation and monitoring wells drilled by the Sunflower Army Ammunitions Plant located in Johnson County.

Table 11--Water use indicated by water-well records (1975-October 1983).

County Use (%)a Number
of WWRs
for county
Percentage of
total WWRs
for 12 counties
Domestic
(based on
1358.3 WWRs)
Lawn and
garden,
stock
(based on
123.8 WWRs)
Public
supply
(based on
73 WWRs)
Industrial
and
commercial
(based on
56.5 WWRs)
Observation
(based on
323 WWRs)
Irrigation
(based on
151.8 WWRs)
Otherb
(based on
146.5 WWRs)
Atchison 71.1 16.2 2.8 1.4 - 8.4 - 71 3.1
Brown 87.9 3.4 2.6 6.0 - - - 116 5.1
Doniphan 78.1 15.6 1.6 3.1 - - 1.6 64 2.8
Douglas 55.8 3.7 5.0 2.7 13.0 7.7 12.0 238 10.4
Jackson 91.5 3.5 2.1 - 2.1 - 0.7 141 6.2
Jefferson 68.6 3.6 8.6 1.4 6.4 9.3 2.1 140 6.1
Johnson 23.1 - 6.4 - 67.0 1.2 2.3 173 7.6
Leavenworth 90.1 0.6 3.3 0.6 3.3 1.6 0.6 363 1.6
Nemaha 63.2 7.0 8.8 - 12.3 - 8.8 57 2.5
Shawnee 55.2 16.1 0.8 2.0 3.1 22.3 0.5 392 17.2
Wabaunsee 79.6 5.0 3.7 1.1 0.6 10.1 - 189 8.3
Wyandotte 8.3 0.3 0.6 7.7 38.9 - 44.2 339 14.8
Total               2283 100.0
Percentage of
total water wells
59.5 5.4 3.2 2.5 14.1 6.6 8.6    
WWR, water-well record.
a. Fractions indicate wells that have more than one use.
b. Uses include test wells, dewatering, and relief wells.

Shawnee County had the greatest number of waterwell records, including 216 domestic wells and 87 irrigation wells. Leavenworth County was second in the number of water-well records, with 90.1%, or 327 wells reported for domestic use. The number of wells in these two counties probably reflects the suburban growth in the Kansas City and Topeka areas. The lawn and garden-stock category was significant in Shawnee, Atchison, and Doniphan counties, with Shawnee County having 63 wells in this category.

Shawnee County had the largest percentage of irrigation wells, with 55.2% of the total number of irrigation wells in the 12-county region. Other counties with irrigation wells are Atchison (six wells), Leavenworth (six wells), Jefferson (13 wells), Douglas (18 wells), and Wabaunsee (19 wells). These irrigation wells are in the Kansas and Missouri River alluvium.

The "Priority List for Technical Assistance" was created by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE, 1983) to help "determin[e] priorities for action in dealing with communities to establish more reliable and better quality water supplies." Water districts in northeastern Kansas included in this list as of April 1983 are separated into three priority categories: high, intermediate, and potential. Problems associated with the high-priority category include a severe lack of an adequate quantity of water; the intermediate category indicates pressure and treatment plant problems, water-quality problems, or less severe quantity problems; and the potential category indicates possible problems with a district's quality or quantity of water. There were no priority listings for Douglas, Jackson, Shawnee, and Wyandotte counties.

The Eskridge district in Wabaunsee County is listed as high priority, having both quantity and quality problems. Eskridge has two wells but is planning to obtain water from Lake Wabaunsee in the future. Wabaunsee County RWD 1, also listed as high priority, has only two wells, which are reported to have poor water quality because of high iron and manganese concentrations.

Leavenworth County RWD 1 is listed under the highpriority category because it has distribution, storage, and pressure problems. The city of Linwood, listed as intermediate priority, has two wells with water-quality problems, specifically high iron and manganese levels. Tonganoxie is listed as a potential problem because of the low quantity of water during drought seasons. Leavenworth County RWD 6 obtains its water from Tonganoxie and consequently is also listed in the potential category.

Brown County has two intermediate-priority districts, including Powhattan and Robinson. Powhattan has two wells with quantity and quality (high nitrate and selenium levels) problems, and Robinson has six wells with quantity and nitrate problems. Brown County RWD 1, which has six wells, is reported to have a distribution problem.

Doniphan County has two intermediate-priority districts: RWD 2 (with only one well) and RWD 3 (with two wells). Both districts have high nitrate concentrations.

Winchester, in Jefferson County, is listed as an intermediate-priority area because of water-quantity and -quality problems. Winchester district's one well has a high nitrate concentration, and its two springs are inadequate to meet user demands. Districts listed as potential problems in Jefferson County include RWD 1, RWD 6, RWD 7, RWD 15, McLouth, and Summerfield. Water-quantity problems exist in RWD 6, RWD 15, and McLouth; and problems with distribution systems exist in RWD 1 and RWD 7. Summerfield has water-quality problems, specifically high sulfate and selenium concentrations. All these districts in Jefferson County obtain their water from wells, except McLouth, which has two springs and seven wells.

Two districts in Nemaha County were listed as intermediate priority. The interconnected RWD 1 and Bern water systems have five wells. Water-quantity problems and high iron levels were cited as reasons for the intermediate rating.

Johnson County has five intermediate-priority areas: Edgerton, Spring Hill, RWD 6, RWD 6A, and RWD 7. All these districts were reported to have water-quantity problems. Spring Hill and RWD 7, which obtain their water from Olathe, have a limited purchase amount, as do RWD 6 and RWD 6A, which obtain their water from DeSoto. Edgerton obtains its water from a reservoir that dries up during droughts and from RWD 7, which has a limited purchase amount. A few of these districts have plans to connect with other water districts to solve their water demands.

A study of northeastern Kansas water supplies was done by Associated Engineers, Inc., and a draft report was completed in May 1980. This study provides basic data and planning information concerning the municipal and industrial water needs in a large region of northeastern Kansas. In general, the study plans for large water-supply systems that have centralized treatment plants and extensive distribution systems. Three sources of water were investigated: impounded surface water (from proposed and existing reservoirs), river water, and ground water. Certain rural water districts and urban areas were chosen as priority areas because of their lack of a sufficient number of wells, high nitrate concentrations, the existence of old wells, water shortages, water shortage during drought, contract problems, high sulfate concentrations, silting of reservoirs, and other impoundment problems. Plans were proposed to meet the needs of these priority areas, the future needs of all areas to the year 2035, and the needs of the present unserved population.

Associated Engineers proposed meeting the water needs of northeastern Kansas chiefly by using surfacewater sources and planning many small reservoirs. Water supply systems along the Missouri River would be largely dependent on the river water, either from an intake system or from alluvial wells. Leavenworth, Atchison, and Doniphan counties are currently largely dependent on Missouri River alluvial waters. Two reservoirs in Atchison County and one in Doniphan County were proposed. In Jackson County a combination of sources is presently in use, including ground water from various alluvial deposits (e.g., the Delaware River) and water from Perry Reservoir. Another reservoir east of the city of Holton was proposed. Perry Lake and the Kansas River alluvium supply water to areas of Jefferson County, and two reservoirs were proposed to be located north of the city of Winchester. Shawnee and Wabaunsee counties are largely dependent on the Kansas River, and reservoirs were proposed in both of these counties. In these two counties water from the Kansas River would be piped to all parts of the counties.

Glacial aquifers were considered in Brown and Nemaha counties. A well field was proposed north of the city of Hiawatha in Brown County, and a well field was proposed in sec. 11, T. 3 S., R. 12 E., in Nemaha County. Brown and Nemaha counties presently depend on glacial aquifers and ground water in general, although the city of Sabetha (Nemaha County) obtains water from a small reservoir.


Prev Page--Aquifer Parameters || Next Page--Chemical Quality

Kansas Geological Survey, Geohydrology
Placed on web March 1, 2015; originally published 1998.
Comments to webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
The URL for this page is http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Bulletins/229/06_use.html