Skip Navigation

Ground-water Quality in Lincolnville

Prev Page--Appendix V || Next Page--Bibliography


Appendix VI--Analytical Methods and Results

Nitrate

Nitrate was determined using a portable colorimeter (Hach Co., Model DR/1A, Ames, IA.) according to a cadmium reduction method modified to use gentisic acid in place of 1-naphthylamine. All necessary reagents were combined into a single stable powder pillow called NitraVer S Nitrate Reagent. The test registered both nitrate and nitrite (as N) present in a 2S ml water sample. In most cases, dilutions were not needed because the operating range 0-30 mg/l as N was used.

The samples were brought to room temperature (20° to 24°C as recommended) before analysis. Only a few samples collected from Clear Creek and well L26 required filtering prior to analysis. One reagent blank (using distilled water) and three nitrate-N standards (10, 20, and 30 mg/l as N) were tested prior to and following each group of samples or when the chemical reagent of one lot number was exhausted and that of another was started. The three standards were freshly prepared each month just before analysis from a stock 100 mg/l nitrate-N standard which was prepared every two to three months.

After each group of samples was analyzed, an averaged blank value was subtracted from each of the sample concentrations and the resulting concentrations were corrected using calibration curves of the nitrate standards. Corrected values that were less than 1 mg/l or zero were reported as <1 mg/l.

The results were converted by multiplying by 4.43 and expressed as mg/l nitrate-NO3 for this study. The results of the nitrate determinations are presented in Table A1.

Several duplicate samples were collected and analyzed for nitrate concentration in order to estimate the analytical error of the in-field testing equipment. The duplicates were analyzed by the Analytical Services Section of the Kansas Geological Survey. The reported accuracy of the automated cadmium reduction method utilized by the Section was 4 percent or less (Standard Methods, 1980). The difference in nitrate concentrations determined by the two methods ranged from 4 to 27 percent with the average difference being 16 percent. The greater percent differences were associated with longer holding times of some samples before nitrate analysis could be performed using the in-field testing equipment. Because samples analyzed using the Hach method were not preserved at the time of collection, the nitrate values reported were consistently lower than the nitrate values obtained using Standard Methods.

Table A1--Results of the nitrate, chloride, and specific conductance determinations.

Well
No.
  1984 1985
July
31
August
1-2
Sept.
24(a)
Oct.
24
Nov.
27
Dec.
17
Jan.
22-23
Feb.
18
March
18
April
24
May
8(a)
May
20-23
June
17
July
24
Aug.
15
L1 Cl 240                            
NO3 --                            
SpCond 2,900                            
L2 Cl 68   39 33 31 31 30 32 36 35 47 53 82 33 35
NO3 --   22 -- 13 13 11 12 14 15 47 85 237 15 19
SpCond 1,270   945 920 920 928 935 934 935 941 1,122 1,183 1,649 947 940
L3 Cl   130 84 69 55 59 88 57 72 71 38 65 94 56 65
NO3   -- 63 -- 28 33 39 27 34 33 15 31 38 28 27
SpCond   2,380 1,560 1,530 1,227 1,363 1,885 1,252 1,617 1,575 757 1,333 1,950 1,263 1,400
L4 Cl             28 29   33     40 32 32
NO3             13 15   18     139 38 19
SpCond             902 895   969     1,263 988 960
L5 Cl   100         23 23 23 26     33 43 36
NO3   --         14 14 20 20     22 26 22
SpCond   1,298         837 830 837 865     900 980 934
L6 Cl   64         23           145   31
NO3   --         19           92   22
SpCond   1,120         885           1,775   901
L7 Cl 48                            
NO3 --                            
SpCond 1,030                            
L8 Cl 243                            
NO3 --                            
SpCond 2,195                            
L9 Cl 63                       60    
NO3 --                       7    
SpCond 1,067                       1,060    
L10 Cl 48   49 34 33 38 33 39 51 49 63 64 69 48 51
NO3 --   30 -- 20 22 19 22 21 21 17 22 21 22 20
SpCond 1,046   940 909 915 974 942 949 1,072 1,052 1,181 1,192 1,219 1,017 1,031
L11 Cl 74                            
NO3 --                            
SpCond 1,361                            
L12 Cl 190           164   162 189   182 175 173 161
NO3 --           37   42 39   48 43 42 36
SpCond 1,735           1,565   1,617 1,725   1,700 1,737 1,665 1,625
L13 Cl 32                            
NO3 --                            
SpCond 934                            
L14 Cl 72           43           81   76
NO3 --           13           62   34
SpCond 1,128           960           1,227   1,135
L15 Cl   137         96 101 110 93     127 112 107
NO3   --         56 47 41 51     36 55 57
SpCond   1,620         1,353 1,360 1,488 1,316     1,620 1,410 1,390
L16 Cl   112 108 107 105 107 103 96 96 103 104 104 100 107 99
NO3   -- 43 -- 25 28 27 31 26 27 35 26 26 26 27
SpCond   1,272 1,260 1,270 1,270 1,270 1,271 1,246 1,245 1,262 1,286 1,288 1,316 1,271 1,245
L17 Cl   52         57 60 58 57   57 50 56 53
NO3   --         38 41 40 37   41 42 39 34
SpCond   921         949 955 960 935   941 959 935 933
L18 Cl   121 125 118 111 103 100 95 102 115 124 114 123 115 114
NO3   -- 38 -- 26 24 19 21 23 28 30 25 26 28 26
SpCond   1,328 1,360 1,345 1,316 1,297 1,280 1,261 1,270 1,352 1,337 1,335 1,370 1,333 1,326
L19 Cl   144 116   93 89 95 100 145 155 196 187 180 149 *116
NO3   -- 115   77 72 67 69 76 88 162 162 144 92 70
SpCond   1,875 1,558   1,445 1,422 1,560 1,585 2,190 2,040 2,430 2,550 2,460 1,980 1,674
L20 Cl   77 84 66 69 68 67 70 69 63 61 69 70 68 70
NO3   -- 90 -- 62 63 55 63 58 55 60 54 55 55 57
SpCond   1,335 1,302 1,253 1,245 1,253 1,236 1,237 1,245 1,220 1,159 1,245 1,235 1,235 1,245
L21 Cl   96 97 83 87 89 88 79 88   104 98 99 98 95
NO3   -- 39 -- 23 24 20 22 24   28 27 27 26 28
SpCond   1,210 1,181 1,168 1,160 1,175 1,145 1,145 1,152   1,220 1,220 1,227 1,210 1,219
L22 Cl             5   9 9   8 8.5 9 10
NO3             18   15 18   19 14 18 16
SpCond             778   784 783   778 796 790 784
L24 Cl             *26 28 25       *33 35 38
NO3             21 20 19       26 25 23
SpCond             877 865 864       955 961 947
L25 Cl             30   71 45       42 38
NO3             27   78 48       35 33
SpCond             947   1,298 1,047       1,030 1,010
L26 Cl             23 23 63 27   73 78 44 61
NO3             16 11 187 27   190 195 56 139
SpCond             902 848 1,660 907   1,725 1,790 1,177 1,517
L27 Cl             58 56 63 55          
NO3             464 473 629 434          
SpCond             1,885 1,875 2,265 1,810          
L27 Cl               (b) 52 (b) 52 (b) 42     (c) 122    
NO3               383 454 269     246    
SpCond               1,675 1,875 1,466     1,445    
L28 Cl 37       41 17 38 27 29 31   30 23 38 28
NO3 --       <1 12 3 8 <1 <1   1 5 2 <1
SpCond 920       961 365 947 621 704 800   807 740 790 674
L29 Cl                           114 107
NO3                           36 34
SpCond                           1,699 1,699
L30 Cl                             173
NO3                             11
SpCond                             1,950
#31 Cl 27 21 26 20 21   19 20 31 21   34 37 22  
NO3 -- -- -- -- 33   29 34 28 31   29 28 26  
SpCond 757 756 750 757 704   783 740 837 761   783 796 790  
(a) Chloride and nitrate concentrations represent results from standard inorganic chemistry analyses.
Specific conductance values represent measurements made in field.
* Well L19: this sample was collected August 19, 1985
* Well L24: these samples were collected January 25 and June 20, 1985, respectively
(b) For well L27: These samples were collected minute(s) after first samples
(c) For well L27: This sample was collected after 2 minutes of pumping. It was reported that approximately
1,600 gallons had been pumped from this well prior to collection of this sample.
Cl - Chloride (mg/L)
NO3 - Nitrate (mg/l as NO3)
SpCond = Specific Conductance (µmhos/cm )

Chloride

Chloride concentrations were determined by using a hand-held digital titrator, a 2.256N Mercuric Nitrate Titration Cartridge, and Diphenylcarbazon Reagent Powder Pillows (Hach Co., Ames, IA.). The analysis was performed on a 100 ml sample of water.

The samples were already at room temperature prior to analysis and several had been filtered prior to the nitrate determinations. One blank (distilled water) and four standards (50, 100, 250, and 500 mg/l Cl) were titrated before and after each group of samples, or when the chemical reagents of one lot number were exhausted and those of another were started. These titrated values were used to construct a calibration curve which was then used to correct the titrated sample concentrations. The estimated analytical error for the chloride determinations was 4 percent. The results are shown in Table A1.

Specific Conductance

Measurements of specific conductance were made at the same time as the chloride analyses. A portable meter (Lectro-MHO, Model MC-1, Mark 4, Lab-Line Instrument Co., Melrose Park, Il.) was used to determine specific conductance and the results are expressed in micromhos per centimeter at 25°C (Table A1). The estimated accuracy of the conductivity meter was 2 percent.

Total Organic Carbon

Volatile (VOC) and nonvolatile organic carbon (NVOC) fractions of total organic carbon (TOC) were determined using a Dohrman/Envirotech DC-80 TOC Analyzer according to methods described by Barcelona (1984). Analyses were performed in the C.L. Burt laboratory, Learned Hall, at the University of Kansas by Dr. Stephen J. Randtke. Analytical precision was ±2% and the detection limit was approximately 0.02 mg/l of carbon. Results of the VOC and NVOC determinations are presented in Table A2.

Table A2

Well No. May 8, 1985 August 15, 1985
VOC
(mg/l)
NVOC
(mg/l)
VOC
(mg/l)
NVOC
(mg/l)
L2 Nil 1.11 Nil 4.47
L3* Nil 6.12 Nil 5.80
L5* Nil 0.74 Nil 1.25
L10 Nil 3.27 Nil 2.15
L16 Nil 1.92 Nil 3.05
L18* Nil 2.95 Nil 4.81
L19 Nil 5.63 Nil 4.88
L20 Nil 4.38 Nil 3.10
L21 Nil 1.22 Nil 3.05
L22* -- -- Nil 3.51
Nil = less than 0.020 mg-C/l.
* well of pre-standard construction

Analysis of the May 8th samples was performed with samples having 1-2 ml of headspace for 24 hours because equipment malfunction had caused the original analyses to be invalid (Randtke, 1985). This could have affected the detection of VOC in these samples. However, the method of sample collection for TOC probably had a greater effect on the detection of VOC.

The May 8th sample from well l3 had a trace of sediment, but the sediment was not disturbed and the sample was not filtered prior to analysis (Randtke, 1985).

Dissolved Gases

Samples collected May 8, 1985, were analyzed for dissolved methane, oxygen, and carbon dioxide using a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer. The analyses were performed by Dr. Charles Judson of the Mass Spectrometry laboratory at the University of Kansas. Methane was determined according to methods described by McAuliffe (1971). The results of the determinations are presented in Table A3.

Table A3

Well No. Methane
(CH4)
(µg/l)
Oxygen
(O2)
(mg/l)
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
(mg/l)
L2 0.7 1.3 13.3
L3* 1.3 1.0 8.3
L5* 0.1 2.7 3.0
L10 0.7 2.2 8.0
L16 1.9 0.5 8.1
L18* 0.1 2.6 5.5
L19 1.5 6.5 40.
L20 2.7 1.9 5.8
L21 -- -- --
* well of pre-standard construction

A sample collected at Well L21 was accidentally broken in the laboratory, therefore, results are not available.

Standard Inorganic Chemistry

The standard inorganic chemistry analyses were performed by the Analytical Services Section of the Kansas Geological Survey housed at Moore Hall on the West Campus of the University of Kansas in Lawrence, KS.

Analytical results for the September 24, 1984 and May 8, 1985 samplings are presented in Table A4. The ionic balances computed for these results indicate that the analyses are very good with the greatest deviation from electroneutrality (the difference between the sums of milliequivalents/l of anions and cations divided by total milliequivalents/l) equal to 2.87 percent for the September 1984 analyses and 2.37 percent for the May 1985 analyses (Hathaway, 1984 and 1985).

Table A4--Results of the standard inorganic chemistry analyses showing percent differences between the September 1984 and May 1985 samplings.

Well
No.
Sample
date
Temp
°C,
field
Specific
conductance,
µmhos/cm
pH,
field
pH,
lab
Total
dissolved
solids,
(calc)
mg/L
SiO2
mg/L
Ca
mg/L
L2 09-24-84 15.5 955 7.2 7.7 598 23 117
05-08-85 14.4 1122 7.15 7.35 699 18 132
% change -7 15 -1 -4 14 -22 11
L3 09-24-84 15 1430 7.15 7.6 1156 30 241
05-08-85   757 6.65 6.8 464 17 90
% change   -47 -7 -10 -60 -43 -63
L10 09-24-84 14.8 960 7.15 7.58 591 20 99
05-08-85 14.7 1181 7.1 7.2 690 16 104
% change -1 19 -1 -5 14 -20 5
06-21-83 15 1540 6.95   898 20 126
% change 1 38 -3   34 0 21
L16 09-24-84 15 1270 7.1 7.5 759 26 134
05-08-85 14.7 1286 7.05 7.15 744 21 132
% change -2 1 -1 -5 -2 -19 -1
L18 09-24-84 15 1380 6.95 7.45 825 28 143
05-08-85 15 1337 7.05 7.15 767 21 130
% change 0 -3 1 -4 -7 -25 -9
L19 09-24-84 14.6 1600 7.1 7.55 1032 24 137
05-08-85 13.6 2430 7.05 7.2 1575 19 161
% change -7 34 -1 -5 34 -21 15
L20 09-24-84 15 131B 7.05 7.6 842 25 134
05-08-85 14.4 1159 7.15 7.3 714 20 117
% change -4 -12 1 -4 -15 -20 -13
L21 09-24-84 14 1219 7.15 7.6 744 23 129
05-08-85 14.2 1220 7.15 7.2 713 18 125
% change 1 0 0 -5 -4 -22 -3

Well
No.
Mg
mg/L
Na
mg/L
K
mg/L
Sr
mg/L
NH4
mg/L
HCO3
mg/L
SO4
mg/L
Cl
mg/L
L2 45 27 2.1 1.8 < 0.1 374 137 39
49 42 1.8 1.9 < 0.1 400 163 47
8 36 -14 5   6 16 17
L3 56 59 8.1 4.2 < 0.1 375 426 84
16 52 1.4 1.2 < 0.1 267 102 38
-71 -12 -83 -71   -29 -76 -55
L10 45 52 3.1 .6 < 0.1 428 81 49
47 89 2.5 .6 0.1 523 93 63
4 42 -19 0   18 13 22
61 126 3.1 .6   553 148 106
26 59 0 0   23 45 54
L16 58 57 3.8 .8 < 0.1 447 108 108
57 56 3.9 .8 < 0.1 441 117 104
-2 -2 2 0   -1 8 -4
L18 56 78 3 .7 < 0.1 473 120 125
51 78 3.5 .6 < 0.1 483 91 124
-9 0 14 -14   2 -24 -1
L19 68 126 3 1.9 < 0.1 459 215 116
84 267 2.7 1 < 0.1 642 366 196
19 53 -10 -47   28 41 41
L20 58 72 4.5 1.2 < 0.1 400 176 84
49 59 6.3 1 < 0.1 388 150 61
-16 -18 28 -17   -3 -15 -27
L21 55 57 5.4 .9 < 0.1 398 141 97
50 60 2.5 1 < 0.1 410 123 104
-9 5 -54 10   3 -13 7

Well
No.
F
mg/L
NO3
mg/L
PO4
mg/L
B
µg/L
Total
Hardness
(CaCO3)
mg/L
Non-Carbonate
Hardness
(CaCO3)
mg/L
L2 .3 22 .09 123 479 173
.3 47   80 533 205
0 53   -35 10 15
L3 .3 63 .12 422 836 529
.2 15   90 292 73
-33 -76   -79 -65 -86
L10 .2 30 .25 54 433 82
.3 17   89 453 25
33 -43   39 4 -70
.2 35     566 113
0 14     23 27
L16 .2 43 .27 183 574 207
.2 35   105 565 203
0 -19   -43 -2 -2
L18 .2 38 .58 203 588 200
.3 30   95 535 139
33 -21   -53 -9 -30
L19 .4 115 .19 144 624 248
.4 162   163 748 222
0 29   12 16 -10
L20 .2 90 .22 135 574 246
.2 60   92 495 177
0 -33   -32 -14 -28
L21 .3 39 .37 114 549 223
.3 28   63 519 183
0 -28   -45 -5 -18

Bacteriological Examination

Examination for fecal coliform and fecal Streptococcus bacteria was conducted by The Environmental laboratory and interpreted and reported by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, both located at Forbes Building 740 in Topeka, KS.

The examination consisted of a search for the presence of coliform bacteria in the water samples collected December 17, 1984 and May 20 and 21, 1985. The method used was the membrane filter count according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1980). The results are presented in Table A5.

The examination consisted of either a 10 ml or 20 ml portion of a 100 ml sample. The number of bacterial counts (colonies) was reported per 100 ml. Therefore, if no bacteria were found, results were reported as less than 10 counts per 100 ml for a 10 ml aliquot, and less than 5 counts per 100 ml for a 20 ml aliquot.

Table A5

Well
No.
December 17, 1984 May 20-21, 1985
fecal
coliform
fecal
Streptococcus
fecal
coliform
fecal
Streptococcus
L2 <5 <5 <10 <10
L3* <5 <5 <10 30
L5* -- -- <10 <10
L10 <5 <5 <10 10
L15 <5 <5 <10 <10
L18* <5 <5 <10 30
L19 <5 <5 <10 <10
L20 <5 <5 <10 10
L21 <5 280 <10 <10
*well of pre-standard construction

Prev Page--Appendix V || Next Page--Bibliography

Kansas Geological Survey, Geohydrology
Placed on web March 16, 2016; originally published 1998.
Comments to webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
The URL for this page is http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Hydro/Publications/1988/OFR88_26/06_append_6.html