DPA Home Page DPA Kansas Page Site Map Help
General Field Info Field Geology Info Field Geophysics Info Field Reservoir Info Field Well Info Play: St. Louis (Lower Mississippian)
Basin: Anadarko
County: Grant and Stanton counties

Big Bow Field--Lithofacies--15-187-20437

Local Site Map Core Desc.

Lithofacies 1: Subtidal Mudstones

Lithology: Silty, Shaly, Skeletal Wackestone-Packstone and Shale
Depositional Environment: Muddy Open Shelf

This lithofacies ranges from 7 to 10 ft thick in Big Bow Field and consists of silty and shaly, fossiliferous limestones interbedded with thin shales (Closeup Photo 58 & Closeup Photo 59 & Thin Section C). It contains abundant and only slightly abraded fragments to nearly whole echinoderm, brachiopod, and bryozoan skeletal grains. Their presence in a micrite-supported shaly rock suggests open but quiet marine conditions. Shaliness of the lithofacies also points toward a quiet, muddy shelf. Lithofacies 1 has a relatively sharp basal contact in the Plummer core (Core Photo 61/67) with the underlying ooid grainstones of Lithofacies 2, and a thin conglomerate of reworked ooid grainstone also marks the basal contact. This contact may represent a subaerial unconformity or a submarine hardground. The gradual increase in shale upward through the unit indicates either a deepening- or shallowing-upward history. Lithofacies 1 is unconformably overlain by Lithofacies 3.


Lithofacies 2: Subtidal Grainstones

Lithology: Porous, Ooid-Skeletal Grainstone
Depositional Environment: Marine Ooid-Skeletal Grain Shoal

Mississippian reservoirs produce from ooid-skeletal grainstones in southwestern Kansas. This lithofacies is about 15 to 20 ft thick in most producing fields. One can easily recognize the lithofacies in cores because of its oolitic and coarse-grained fossil content (Closeup Photo 77), its large primary interparticle pores, and dark yellowish brown oil stain. Porous ooid-skeletal gainstones are also easily recognized by the electric-log signatures, because the resistivity, sonic, and density curves faithfully record this facies' interconnected porosity (Thin Section B). Porosity ranges from 10 to 15 percent, and permeabilities commonly reach 100 md.

Ooids are fine- to medium-grained and well sorted. They have radial-concentric cortices surrounding echinoderm, bryozoan, and peloid nuclei. Intermixed skeletal components include crinoids, bryozoans, brachiopods, and foraminifers. Crinoids are almost as abundant as the ooids in some parts of the lithofacies (Closeup Photo 80.5). Most are medium-grained, but some reach very coarse and granule size. As skeletal content increases, overall sorting decreases. Skeletal grains range from nearly whole and barely abraded to broken, well-worn particles. Largest skeletal grains are up to 9.6 mm in diameter. Quartz sand is rarely present.

Cross-bedding is present but does not dominate the lithofacies. Cross sets are less than 1 ft m thick, and foreset laminae have dips of approximately 10'. The laminae are made up of alternating ooid-rich and skeletal-rich layers.

Characteristics of Lithofacies 2 indicate deposition in shallow-marine shoals, perhaps similar to Bahamian marine sand-belts (Ball, 1967; Handford, 1988). The presence of skeletal grains in these oolitic limestones indicates that open-shelf fauna either inhabited portions of the shoal or that the shoal was juxtaposed to an open shelf so that sediment mixing could occur, most likely during storms.


Lithofacies 3: Eolanites

Lithology: Siliciclastic, Peloid-Ooid, Skeletal Grainstones
Depositional Environment: Coastal Eolianite

This lithofacies forms stacked eolianite units averaging about 10 ft thick in Big Bow Field, with each unit representing the depositional remains of migrating eolian dune bodies. Interdune-wadi deposits, approximately 4.5 ft thick, of Lithofacies 4 separate each of the eolianite units.

The coastal carbonate eolianites contain approximately 15 to 20 percent siliciclastic sand, with the balance made up of peloids, ooids, and skeletal grains (Closeup Photo 89). Dominant skeletal gains include echinoderrns, brachiopods, bryozoans, and foraminifers. All of the skeletal grains are very well rounded and spherical; even the normally platy or bladed brachiopods and bryozoans have been worn into spherical grains. Furthermore, some ooid coatings are partially worn.

In contrast to the marine-shoal grainstones, all of the ooids and skeletal particles in the eolianite lithofacies are fine to medium grained. Peloids, however, average 0.09 mm (very fine gain size). Thus, the carbonate fraction commonly has a bimodal size distribution. This is also true of the quartz fraction, which comprises two populations: subangular coarse silt and well-rounded coarse sand (Thin Section A). Both populations are either scattered throughout the lithofacies or they are present as discrete sedimentary laminae and insoluble concentrations along stylolites.

The eolianite lithofacies contains both well sorted and bimodal grain populations, of fine to medium sand; whereas, the marine shoal lithofacies is made up of moderately to poorly sorted, medium to very coarse grained particles. These textural differences reflect the change from subaqueous to eolian physical processes of sedimentation present in marine to eolian environments.

The eolianite lithofacies is almost pervasively cross-bedded. This is in contrast to the marine gainstone lithofacies, which is both cross-bedded and bioturbated. Eolianite cross-bed sets range from less than 1 to 10 ft thick and average approximately 1 to 3 ft. Foreset laminae are inclined about 16' to 20', with dip angles locally increasing from bottom to top in individual sets.

Evidence for subaerial weathering is seen in an eolianite, which grades upward into a 3 ft thick breccia of eolianite (Core Photo 80/85) Clasts are poorly sorted, angular to rounded, and range from approximately 1 to 6 inches in diameter. Despite some rounding of clasts, this breccia shows no evidence of sediment transport, because some appear to be fitted, and they are barely separated from one another by a matrix of eolianite sand. A carbonate mudstone is the prevalent matrix at the top of the breccia. The clasts formed as a result of subaerial weathering (disaggregation) of a surface and near-surface crust of weakly cemented eolianite. The grainy sediment between clasts was deposited as loose dune sand, and the carbonate mud probably represents pond and/or initial marine sediment filtered in from above during a subsequent transgression.


Depositional Summary

Mississippian St. Louis strata record deposition in open, shallow-marine environments. The St. Genevieve Depositional Model is a hypothetical representation of all the environments. Porous, ooid-skeletal grainstones are transitional with shaly wackestones, which indicates that the open shelf passed laterally into ooid-skeletal shoal environments. Eolianites are inferred to have accumulated along the coast next to shallow grain shoals because the ooid and skeletal carbonate grains comprising the eolianites are the same type present in the shoal facies. Onshore winds blew loose carbonate grains from beaches and exposed shoals into subaerial backshore environments. The presence of interbedded sandstones and disseminated siliciclastic sand in the eolianites suggests that the eolian dunes and wadi-interdune environments lay adjacent to each other. The relative lack of siliciclastic sands in the offshore carbonates is attributed to limited fluvial input to the sea. Ephemeral streams emptied into the interdune environments, but the dunes probably blocked them from entering the sea. In addition, if paleowinds consistently blew onshore, little siliciclastic material could have been transported to the shoreline by eolian processes.

St. Genevieve Depositional Model


References

Carr, T. R. and Lundgren, C. E., 1994, Use of Gamma Ray Spectral Log to Recognize Exposure Surfaces at the Reservoir Scale: Big Bow Field (St Louis Limestone), Kansas: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, p. 79-88.

Handford, C.R. and Francka, B. J., 1991, Mississippian Carbonate-Siliclastic Eolianites in Southwestern Kansas: SEPM Core Workshop No. 15, p. 205-244.


Kansas Geological Survey, Digital Petroleum Atlas
Send comments and/or suggestions to webadmin@kgs.ku.edu
Updated Nov. 14, 1996
URL = http://www.kgs.ku.edu/DPA/BigBow/CoreDesc/20437/20437_lith.html